Aircraft

SkyFly Axe personal eVTOL flies in the sky, as the name suggests

SkyFly Axe personal eVTOL flies in the sky, as the name suggests
Cool guys don't look at explosions. This guy doesn't even glance back over his shoulder at his eVTOL aircraft. Instagram must be pumping today
Cool guys don't look at explosions. This guy doesn't even glance back over his shoulder at his eVTOL aircraft. Instagram must be pumping today
View 10 Images
The Axe tilts a fair way backward for VTOL
1/10
The Axe tilts a fair way backward for VTOL
Starting price of UK£150,000
2/10
Starting price of UK£150,000
Three-wheel landing gear allows conventional short takeoff and landing
3/10
Three-wheel landing gear allows conventional short takeoff and landing
Each prop has two motors acting on it, for redundancy
4/10
Each prop has two motors acting on it, for redundancy
Two-seat aircraft looks pretty clean without the extra redundant props you typically see
5/10
Two-seat aircraft looks pretty clean without the extra redundant props you typically see
Cool guys don't look at explosions. This guy doesn't even glance back over his shoulder at his eVTOL aircraft. Instagram must be pumping today
6/10
Cool guys don't look at explosions. This guy doesn't even glance back over his shoulder at his eVTOL aircraft. Instagram must be pumping today
He clearly flies it from one of his homes to the other, which is a perfect mirror image
7/10
He clearly flies it from one of his homes to the other, which is a perfect mirror image
The SkyFly Axe flies in the sky
8/10
The SkyFly Axe flies in the sky
A tasteful match for your superyacht
9/10
A tasteful match for your superyacht
It's like a tender for your private jet
10/10
It's like a tender for your private jet
View gallery - 10 images

London company SkyFly has opened pre-orders on a two-seat personal eVTOL aircraft called the Axe. Scheduled to begin customer deliveries in 2024, the Axe promises 160-km/h (100-mph) top speeds, up to 320 km (200 miles) of range, and a winged airframe.

Let me first say, I'm fully aware of what a brutal job it is to name a company. You're never going to please everyone, and at some point you've gotta go with whatever you can get the domain name for. But ... SkyFly? SkyFly. I'm glad you specified, guys, I was going to fly it in the bath.

What we've got here is one step up in complexity from a simple manned multicopter like the Jetson One or Ryse Recon, but a big step down from tilting propulsion designs like most of the larger air taxis. Like the Air One, the Axe has wings – reasonably large canards and main wings emerging from the tail section.

Two-seat aircraft looks pretty clean without the extra redundant props you typically see
Two-seat aircraft looks pretty clean without the extra redundant props you typically see

Parked on the ground, these 5-m (16.4-ft) wings are pitched oddly upward, giving the Axe a fairly strange look if you're used to conventional aircraft. But it's not a conventional aircraft; dynamically it's closer to a big multicopter. It rises vertically on four large 1.5-m-diameter (4.9-ft) props, and, like a consumer drone, it tilts forward to develop horizontal speed. So once it's moving at a speed relevant to producing wing lift, the whole aircraft is pitched forward, and the wings are level as you fly. In the sky.

Interestingly, yes, the Axe uses just four props. Generally for these machines, six is a bare minimum. The Air One has eight, mounted coaxially, which is a neat way of doing things if you don't want to have to find space for more prop mounts around your chassis. The extra props are there for redundancy; they take up the load if something fails so the aircraft doesn't plummet out of the sky. Most eVTOLs have redundant backups for all critical systems.

Does this mean SkyFly has abandoned the concept of redundancy? No. In this case, each of those four props has two 35-kW motors acting on it, so failures on up to two motors are covered. There's also quadruple redundancy in the flight control system, says SkyFly, as well as two separate battery packs in case one gives up the ghost. Not to mention, the wings have control surfaces you can use to bring yourself down for a conventional landing if you've got the airspeed to do it. So really, the only thing not covered here that other eVTOLs have a handle on is prop destruction in a hover – say, if a bird ignores the whooshing noise and gets vitamized.

The SkyFly Axe flies in the sky
The SkyFly Axe flies in the sky

We'd best get through a few specs. The Axe weighs 428 kg (944 lb) with a 48-kWh battery pack on board. It'll lift two people, up to a maximum weight of 172 kg (379 lb), and fly up to 160 km (100 miles) on battery power. If you need to go further, there's a hybrid option as well, which uses a smaller battery pack alongside a range-extending generator. This version can get you up to 320 km (200 miles) of range. Max takeoff weight is 600 kg (1,323 lb), and max thrust is quoted at 700 kg (1,543 lb).

It runs a three-wheel set of landing gear, and interestingly SkyFly says it can perform a short conventional takeoff with 50 m (164 ft) of runway in front of it, if you don't want to burn battery by going fully VTOL. Presumably, the rear props give it a little extra gumboot to tilt the whole aircraft forward and scoot along the ground on the front wheels, angling the props further forward for STOL operations. It'll be interesting to see! Conversely, the cabin is tilted a fair way back during VTOL operations, so presumably there are cameras and whatnot to help pilots land in the circle.

Because it can operate like a fixed wing, you'll be able to fly the Axe with a standard fixed-wing pilot's license – at least, until eVTOL-specific licenses start popping up. Indeed, SkyFly is positioning this thing as a training platform for pilots planning to move into air taxi work. You can register it as kit-built, or certify it as a very light aircraft, or experimental aircraft in the UK.

The Axe tilts a fair way backward for VTOL
The Axe tilts a fair way backward for VTOL

Price? Well, price is a bit of an issue. SkyFly is taking pre-orders at a base price of £150,000 (US$175,000). Some of the options seem a little pricey; the range-extended version will set you back around another £50,000 (US$58,300), for example, and if you want a last-resort ballistic parachute on board, you're looking at another £20,000 (US$23,300).

So it sure ain't cheap, which I suppose explains why SkyFly's renders show this thing wafting around superyachts, golf courses, private jets, vineyards and fancy-looking houses with just enough leaf matter tastefully sprinkled around to convey that the owner's a pretty chill dude who isn't going to let some downwash-driven de-manicuring of his lawn ruin his day. Good for you, sir, you can check that phone with a light heart.

SkyFly has released video, in which a prototype flies, and does so in the sky as the name would suggest. It's maybe 50% scale, and it demonstrates (nearly) vertical takeoff, hover, forward flight, and vertical landing. Check it out below.

Prototype proven Axe 2-seat E-VTOL - USD 180,000

Source: SkyFly

View gallery - 10 images
13 comments
13 comments
guzmanchinky
I'm a pilot with a few hundred hours. This looks quite feasible, but if a prop goes (and they can disintegrate) it's inherently going to violently roll, which will make the BRS (parachute) useless. That said, every aircraft has it's envelope and failure points. The price is right (about a new Cessna) and the range is decent. And before people chime in to say those props will chop you up, 1. They are electric and stop in an instant and 2. Cessna props and tail rotors kill people today.
Ron
Nice looking craft, but anything with open unguarded props is doomed to fail, someone is bound to walk into one of those props while spinning and that will be that.
Gazza
That's hilarious! Love the tone Loz, well written!!!
Dr. Saul Pressman
I have yet to see any of the dozens of designs come close to the ease of use and inherent safety and low cost of the old gyrocopter. If the engine fails, the overhead rotor will windmill and give you a chance to survive. It is far more fuel efficient and cheaper to fly. I think there were even 2 seaters made back in the day. Stop reinventing the wheel and use what we already have.
Q
Defiantly interesting - want to see the full functional model with duration testing and demonstrated failure mode controls.
Steven Clarkson
@RON
Funny how you missed Guzmanchinky's comment. Your comment was doomed before you even posted it.

All aircraft have open props, people have been struck by these props for as long as aviation existed, are you going to tell thd FAA to stop producing aircraft with props lol.

@dr Saul
I have seen a lot of craft safer than a gyrocopter including multicopters, which are more versatile.

Fact which old timers and flat earthers just cant get imprinted in their stiff heads no matter if they even see it for real:

Electric motors and ICE engines are universes apart in terms if reliability.

Expect no "Engine outs" with Electrics
So that is safety superiorrity point nr 1.
Nr2. NO A GYRO is NOT far more fuel efficient. A Gyrocopter is one of the most fuel guzzling aircraft in light aviation. The mainrotor is pure drag that needs to be pushed through the air by the poor little back prop. The main rotor does not propel the craft.

Reinventing the wheel ? No Sir we have revolutionized the wheel !
Right here right now ! ! !
Multicopters is the next pioneering revolution.
Say hello to Electronic stabilty and reliability and super efficient electronic propulsion.
Time to get out of the cave and experience the future that is here right now ! ! !
Towerman
Aaahh 3 bladers its about time they are utilized more in the manned multirotor revolution.

@ dr Saul no you need to learn the basics of multicopters you have a lot to learn still ;) hint, start by Reading the article again:

"" In this case, each of those four props has two 35-kW motors acting on it, so failures on up to two motors are covered. There's also""
Towerman
Besides the extra added redundency, electric motors simply does not fail.
Chris Manning
May have been addressed but, with that clear canopy, the cockpit is going to be smoking hot. Of course a/c could be added but, at what cost to the distance traveled. It’s very cool though. Good luck
ljaques
"Look, Ma, no view whatsoever out the canopy!" The $256.6k price should keep a lot of people from investing in one. (sigh)
Cute little things. No wonder Mr. Cool flies it from one side of his house to the other.
But why did Ms. Cool park hers in front of her Lear?
Load More