Aircraft

Second high-profile test flight crash rocks eVTOL industry

Second high-profile test flight crash rocks eVTOL industry
Britain is now without a full-size eVTOL air taxi prototype after the unfortunate test flight crash of Vertical Aerospace's VX4
Britain is now without a full-size eVTOL air taxi prototype after the unfortunate test flight crash of Vertical Aerospace's VX4
View 3 Images
Britain is now without a full-size eVTOL air taxi prototype after the unfortunate test flight crash of Vertical Aerospace's VX4
1/3
Britain is now without a full-size eVTOL air taxi prototype after the unfortunate test flight crash of Vertical Aerospace's VX4
Chief Test Pilot Justin Paines prepares for the first test flight of the full-scale Vertical Aerospace VX-4 prototype
2/3
Chief Test Pilot Justin Paines prepares for the first test flight of the full-scale Vertical Aerospace VX-4 prototype
The VX4 airframe uses a tilting bank of five-blade props at the front, and a bank of scissor-stowing 4-blade props at the back
3/3
The VX4 airframe uses a tilting bank of five-blade props at the front, and a bank of scissor-stowing 4-blade props at the back
View gallery - 3 images

Leading UK eVTOL company Vertical Aerospace has suffered an expensive-looking setback just weeks into its off-tether flight test program. Its VX4 air taxi prototype reportedly hit the deck from about 20 ft up, snapping a wing and making quite a mess.

The company has confirmed the incident in a SEC filing, stating: "On Wednesday August 9, 2023, Vertical Aerospace Ltd.’s experimental prototype aircraft was involved in an incident during flight testing at its Flight Test Centre at Cotswold Airport, UK. The aircraft was remotely piloted and there were no injuries.

"Our flight test programme is designed to establish the limits of the aircraft’s performance, and the incident occurred during an uncrewed test of the aircraft’s maneuverability during a motor failure test scenario, which is a key requirement to progress to crewed operations. We are working closely with the relevant authorities."

According to an "airfield source" speaking to Pilotweb.aero, the prototype lost control at an altitude of only about 20 ft (6 m) – but that's certainly high enough to leave a mark. In the above photo, it's apparent that the right wing of the VX4's carbon fiber airframe has acquired a jaunty new angle, and that's certainly not the only damage here. The lithium battery pack appears to have survived without catching fire, providing one positive takeaway from the incident.

This is not the first time one of these cutting-edge electric air taxis has come off second best in a disagreement with the ground. Back in February 2022, overall eVTOL market leader Joby Aviation suffered a much more extreme test flight crash, when its experimental S4 prototype, tail number N542AJ, ploughed into the California forest after a test flight that pushed airspeeds over 270 mph (435 km/h) – much faster than the S4's advertised top speed of 200 mph (322 km/h).

But there are key differences here; Joby, for starters, was well advanced into its unmanned flight test program when it lost the prototype, having already flown hundreds of tests throughout all stages of flight, including routine transitions from VTOL mode to wing-supported cruise flight and back again. Vertical Aerospace lost its VX4 right at the beginning of its test program, operating solely in VTOL hover mode and having only just come off safety tethers.

Joby also had a second S4 prototype up and running when it lost the first, so it was able to continue testing – Vertical Aerospace doesn't, it's just lost its only full-size test aircraft – although a second prototype, closer to the company's proposed production aircraft, is in the works.

Vertical Aerospace isn't commenting yet on how bad the damage is, whether the prototype might be repairable, or what this setback might mean for the company's timelines as it pushes toward multi-region type certification and the start of manufacturing, with a monster 1,400 conditional pre-orders in the books. Earlier this year, VA pushed its expected commercial debut back from 2025 to 2026.

The VX4 airframe uses a tilting bank of five-blade props at the front, and a bank of scissor-stowing 4-blade props at the back
The VX4 airframe uses a tilting bank of five-blade props at the front, and a bank of scissor-stowing 4-blade props at the back

But such are the trials and tribulations for companies working to push (potentially) massively disruptive new technologies into the high-stakes world of aviation, where failures are very public.

Electric VTOL aircraft promise fast, quiet, clean, and most compellingly, very affordable new ways to hop across traffic or town to town. If they deliver on their promises, eVTOLs represent the democratization of 3-dimensional commuting, putting helicopter-style travel (minus the wall-shaking soundtrack) within just about anyone's reach. They could change the shape and design of future cities.

But to do so in a commercial sense, they need to prove they're every bit as safe as airline flight. Let's hope not too many more eggs are broken trying to make that omelet – but now, before there are people on board, is definitely the best time for these incidents to happen.

Source: Vertical Aerospace via Pilotweb.aero

View gallery - 3 images
8 comments
8 comments
Aermaco
I'm surprised to see no comments yet on this evolving early phase of the future of 3Dimensional travel. But like all early phases in history it suffers Group Think that is in great need of better wider awareness of potentials. Even 2D suffered GT in every step forward . But Joby as the leader naturally will learn more and faster by stressing the envelopes.
guzmanchinky
Well, it's a good thing completely new aircraft designs have never had any problems or crashes in the past! (extreme sarcasm)
Brian M
The level of safety/reliability of this new breed of aircraft probably needs to be higher than more conventional aircraft in that their operating area is more over highly populated areas than conventional flights, i.e. non users are having to pay a risk.

Suspect they should have at least a good record once approved as conventional aircraft.
Rocky Stefano
All aircraft designs suffer failure. Even after certification. Let's not forget the Boeing debacle\tragedy with the 737 Max.
nick101
Plummeting to the ground would certainly give me pause as to taking that ride again!
Towerman
My bet is on Nasa's Epiphany Transporter making news this week, a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) vehicle that the company said is capable of a top speed of 160 mph (258 kph) but generates less than 55 decibels of noise at 50 feet (15 meters) up, which is somewhere between the volume of a steady rainfall (50 dB) and normal human conversation (60 dB).

Towerman
Epiphany Transporter is what an evtol should look like ! You can even park it in a garage !
Aermaco
Yes that aptly named "Epiphany" has more practical flight functionality and with garage parking size it comes closer to ideal with its rotating ducts. If the struts where also wings for more lift adding to the marginally lifting ducts, it could gain better efficiency and end all prop lift for high speed cruise.