Automotive

Your car’s 'safety' bleeps may actually degrade safe driving

Your car’s 'safety' bleeps may actually degrade safe driving
In-vehicle safety alerts may not be all positive for driving safety
In-vehicle safety alerts may not be all positive for driving safety
View 2 Images
In-vehicle safety alerts may not be all positive for driving safety
1/2
In-vehicle safety alerts may not be all positive for driving safety
Researchers tested sensor-based ADAS features like forward collision and lane departure warning systems
2/2
Researchers tested sensor-based ADAS features like forward collision and lane departure warning systems

Most modern cars offer Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADAS) that work hard to keep drivers safe. For example, the Lane Departure Warning on my 2023 SUV sounds an alarm if, intentionally or not, I drift laterally across a white line. It’s designed to prevent my veering off course from distraction or sleepiness.

Research has established that such systems do prevent crashes. Nevertheless, some drivers find their winks and prods irritating and often unnecessary. Recently, a carefully constructed study has shown that use of them also modifies driver behavior and that the change is often for the worse.

The study, by researchers at universities in the United States and Hong Kong, drew its data from telematics collected in the US by a major, and unnamed, car maker. The telematics data, whose widespread collection by manufacturers has spurred efforts to protect driver privacy, provided information on vehicle performance, such as speed and acceleration, and vehicle trips, such as when and where vehicles were running.

The data also offered, in aggregate, details on driver attributes such as age, gender, and income level. By tracking the ages of the cars in the study, the researchers could also see how driver behavior changed over time.

The authors set out to distinguish effects on drivers from two kinds of ADAS: those that demand immediate corrective action and those that are merely informative. They predicted that drivers using only the demanding alerts would operate their vehicles less carefully than they might have without them while those using only the informative alerts would drive more carefully. And this turned out to be so.

For examples of demanding ADAS, they focused on Forward Collision Warning, which sounds an alarm when the system infers that the car is in danger of colliding with an object ahead of it, and the Lane Departure Warning referenced above. In the US, they found, these two systems were almost always optioned as a bundle.

Researchers tested sensor-based ADAS features like forward collision and lane departure warning systems
Researchers tested sensor-based ADAS features like forward collision and lane departure warning systems

For an example of a merely informative ADAS, they looked at cars equipped only with Blind Spot Detection, which restricts itself to flashing a visual alert when another vehicle is approaching alongside from the rear.

As a control group, they used a sample of cars that had none of the aforementioned ADAS systems. All three samples together added up to 195,743 cars, located across the US.

To gauge driver behavior, the study focused on speed and braking. On the speed front, it looked not at whether drivers were exceeding posted speed limits but at how fast they drove in relation to the average speed of all drivers on the same stretch of roadway.

Speeding was defined as driving at more than one standard deviation faster than the average speed. Hard braking was defined as decelerating at rates in excess of 6mph (10km/h) per second.

“Reduced hard braking and speeding events point to improved general driving behavior,” the authors observed.

The study found that drivers using only the Forward Collision and Lane Departure warnings had about 5% more speeding incidents and 6% more hard braking incidents, daily, compared with drivers not using ADAS at all.

In contrast, drivers using only Blind Spot Detection had 9% fewer speeding incidents and nearly 7% fewer hard braking incidents, compared with drivers not using ADAS.

Over time, both effects increased slightly.

In speculating about reasons for these behavioral effects, the authors proposed that ADAS prompts that demand urgent action from drivers trigger what they call System 1 cognitive processing, which is rapid and automatic. Drivers reacting this way may experience the frequent warnings as signs that the ADAS is making them safer, and therefore feel comfortable to act with less caution.

They proposed that ADAS that is merely informative, such as Blind Spot Detection, is more likely to generate System 2 thinking, in which people reflect on their experience, learn from it, and deliberately adjust their behavior.

As a test of these ideas, they compared the behavior of men using each system with that of women. Various studies have suggested that females would be slower than males to add risk from experiencing urgent ADAS prompts and faster than males to learn reflectively from informative prompts, they said. Sure enough, such a sex difference was reflected in the results.

It's worth emphasizing that even with the reported behavior changes, both types of ADAS system were effective in reducing collisions. Forward Collision and Lane Departure warnings together cut collision rates by 15%, and blind-spot monitoring by 19%, the authors reported.

However, they said car companies should think about how to mitigate the negative behavioral effects of urgent ADAS warnings. We can hope that their research encourages systems that expose us less to jarring bells and bleeps.

The study, titled General Behavioral Impact of Smart System Warnings: A Case of Advanced Driving Assistance Systems, was published in the journal Production and Operations Management

Source: AutoTech News.

12 comments
12 comments
YourAmazonOrder
What?!? People got lazy because they depended upon their vehicles to do the driving for them?!? They were just ignoring all the feedback they got because TikTok or their text messages or their eye makeup or the burrito they were stuffing in to their fat faces were more important??? Nahhhh... can't be. Not *people!* People who get licenses to drive are responsible, have total situational awareness and always observing road signs, hazards and courteous to other drivers!
yawood
This article does not surprise me at all. I bought a car with the highest level of trim, so it had all the warning features, radar cruise etc etc and I couldn't stand it. I love driving and I believe that I am a good driver (though I probably tend to drive a bit fast), but all the electronic "aids" were so distracting and annoying that they detracted from the concentration I normally have while driving. I sold the fancy one and bought a ten year old BMW which has a reasonable level of "aids", such as blind spot warning, unobtrusive lane departure etc and my concentration and enjoyment of driving has returned.
Stever
It has long been blindingly obvious to any experienced driver, that most of the supposedly safety-related geegaws, 'bells & whistles', that comprise part of modern cars are in fact a hazardous distraction from the situational awareness referenced by the earlier commentator. Worse yet, the interior screens diminish the reality of imminent death that lurks just beyond the windscreen. I won't get into the obvious sociopolitical & commercial foundations of these 'aids'...
highlandboy
Try driving a Tesla. Phantom braking, a steering tug that moves you towards traffic away from the dangerous line that marks the edge of the road (sarcasm intended). Annoying beeps that make you look at the screen in the center of the car if you want to know why it’s beeping. And while FSD may be excellent (I haven’t tried it), Enhanced Autopilot is like baby sitting a 2 year old with no impulse control & no common sense as to how traffic behaves.
martinwinlow
Nothing is as moronically distracting as the warning in my car (whose brand shall remain nameless - maybe all US-made cars do it?) when you activate the indicator ('blinker' if you *really* must) that pops up on the dash display saying "Don't forget to check your mirrors"!! I mean, *seriously*?!!! Wouldn't using the time taken to read that message actually be put to better use to, you know, CHECK YOUR MIRRORS???!!!
martinwinlow
@ Stever - Maybe it's all about 'softening us up' for the inevitable transition to autonomous driving?
BarronScout
Sum it up very nicely with this statement - "I should not have to take a intro course in how to operate the vehicle just to know how to operate wipers, lights, and turn the volume down." Between all these safety improvements over the last couple decades and all the new features installed in cars it is amazing there are not more accidents than there are.
Buddy rented a Ford Expedition and had to learn how the swipe control worked to use any of the features on the steering wheel. I have personally gotten into basic cars like Civic or Hyundai and take a couple minutes, not seconds, to figure out simple controls. And I work on new cars for a living.
Part of the problem is regulation on ADAS mandates some of the system behavior that is causing the problem. The Front Assist and Lane Keeping should just happen, rather than beeping and prodding before. Too many pre-warnings so people get used to pushing the limits and driving more dangerously and expecting computer to bail them out at last second.
Special call out to Tesla - PUT A "CLUSTER" IN FRONT OF DRIVER FOR DRIVING INFO! Nothing more annoying than trying to make everything auto and having to keep looking to the "side" to see what is going on.
JR65
My current car has all the safety gizmos. I almost never hear from them since I am focussed on driving and not other distractions. I strongly suspect that those who frequently are annoyed by the safety systems are no where near as good a driver as they think they are.
F
Every 7 to 9 days, my vehicle forces me to look at the main screen to acknowledge a message instructing me to keep my eyes on the road . . . rather than that screen.
dwieb
In the US it has become more dangerous for people traveling *not inside* vehicles. Certainly ADAS is not helping much. The problem is due to larger vehicles, less visibility, faster speeds, and more driver distractions. We don't want to slow down, though doing so would make travel less stressful and save energy. We like and feel safer in our large trucks and SUVs. We think cameras are enough for visibility, and with ever decreasing attention spans we really like distractions. I just avoid it all as much as possible, it's like a permanent vacation.
Load More