Biology

Your liver stays just three years old on average throughout your life

Your liver stays just three ye...
Researchers have calculated the average age of human liver cells and found that they remain about three years old, no matter the age of the person
Researchers have calculated the average age of human liver cells and found that they remain about three years old, no matter the age of the person
View 2 Images
Researchers have calculated the average age of human liver cells and found that they remain about three years old, no matter the age of the person
1/2
Researchers have calculated the average age of human liver cells and found that they remain about three years old, no matter the age of the person
The white arrows indicate liver cells with the usual two sets of chromosomes, while the yellow arrows are cells that
2/2
The white arrows indicate liver cells with the usual two sets of chromosomes, while the yellow arrows are cells that accumulate more

The liver can regenerate itself after taking damage, but whether that ability fades as we age has long been unknown. A new study has found that age doesn’t slow down the liver’s regeneration, and whether you’re 20 or 80, your liver is on average just three years old.

The liver has the hazardous job of detoxifying the body, and because of its regular exposure to toxins, it risks more injury than most organs. To keep us healthy throughout our lives, the liver has developed a remarkable regenerative capacity, unique among organs. But how exactly it pulls off the feat – and whether it slows with age – has remained a mystery that animal models have been unable to clarify. So for the new study, researchers at TU Dresden wanted to find out.

“Some studies pointed to the possibility that liver cells are long-lived while others showed a constant turnover,” said Dr. Olaf Bergmann, corresponding author of the study. “It was clear to us that if we want to know what happens in humans, we need to find a way to directly assess the age of human liver cells.”

To find their solution, the team turned to an unlikely source – the nuclear tests of the 1950s. When the nukes were detonated above ground, huge amounts of radiocarbon were blasted into the atmosphere, and subsequently taken up by plants and animals into their very DNA. After above-ground nuclear testing was banned in 1963, atmospheric levels of radiocarbon has dropped year on year – and so did the levels in the cells of organisms.

“Even though these are negligible amounts that are not harmful, we can detect and measure them in tissue samples,” said Bergmann. “By comparing the values to the levels of atmospheric radiocarbon, we can retrospectively establish the age of the cells.”

To put the idea into practice, the team analyzed the radiocarbon levels of the livers of 33 deceased people between the ages of 20 and 84 years. And sure enough, they found that the organ was roughly the same age – a little under three years old on average – no matter the age of the person. But not all cells in a given liver were the same age – some were found to regenerate every year or so, while others could stick around for as long as a decade. Intriguingly, the longer-living cells were those that had accumulated more sets of chromosomes.

The white arrows indicate liver cells with the usual two sets of chromosomes, while the yellow arrows are cells that
The white arrows indicate liver cells with the usual two sets of chromosomes, while the yellow arrows are cells that accumulate more

“Most of our cells have two sets of chromosomes, but some cells accumulate more DNA as they age,” said Bergmann. “In the end, such cells can carry four, eight, or even more sets of chromosomes. As this fraction [in the liver] gradually increases with age, this could be a protective mechanism that safeguards us from accumulating harmful mutations. We need to find out if there are similar mechanisms in chronic liver disease, which in some cases can turn into cancer.”

The research was published in the journal Cell Systems.

Source: TU Dresden

3 comments
3 comments
Martin Hone
Interesting, but how do you explain the devastating effects of liver disease, from alcohol abuse or whatever, if the liver regenerates so often ?
martinwinlow
@ Martin Hone - Alcoholics get *plenty* of warning that they are simply damaging their livers more quickly than the organ can repair itself (I'm minded of poor old George Best, here). I don't think most 'normal' people have any idea just how much alcohol a real alcoholic can get through in a day. That which would essentially kill an adult non-drinker is merely an aperitif for a terminal alcoholic.

What interests me is why the liver can do this and no other organ? And why has it evolved thus whilst the rest of the body is typically condemned to 3-score years and 10?
Baker Steve
I seem to remember reading somewhere that research had shown up a spike in liver cancers approximately ten years after a person had stopped drinking alcohol. I suppose that in a regenerating organ the likelihood of rogue cells going cancerous is statistically higher.