Boeing throws its weight behind Larry Page's flying taxi startup
With the backing of Google co-founder Larry Page, California-based startup Kitty Hawk already has some noteworthy names attached to its flying taxi endeavors. And it has now found another in heavyweight Boeing, with the industry veteran teaming up with its fresh-faced counterpart to accelerate the age of electric aviation.
Kitty Hawk first showed off its Cora aircraft last year, detailing a two-seater short hop electric plane that uses 12 propellors mounted on its wings to take off vertically, and then a single prop at the rear for horizontal flight. The company says the aircraft can cover around 62 miles (100 km) per charge of its battery and hit speeds of 110 mph (180 km/h).
The division behind Cora has now entered a strategic partnership with Boeing, with the two to work together on advancing "safe urban air mobility."
Boeing already has its fingers in a number of flying taxi-flavored pies, including its own in-house electric VTOL aircraft, a recent acquisition of electric aircraft company Aurora, and its US$2 million contest to build a personal flying machine.
"Working with a company like Kitty Hawk brings us closer to our goal of safely advancing the future of mobility," says Steve Nordlund, vice president and general manager of Boeing NeXt. "We have a shared vision of how people, goods and ideas will be transported in the future, as well as the safety and regulatory ecosystem that will underpin that transportation."
Please keep comments to less than 150 words. No abusive material or spam will be published.
@Anthony88 Boeing already has that kind of copter, it's just a glorified helicopter, Yes it is fast, but over complicated and bulky not to mention a maintenance hog.
While i am not in favor of this particular design at all as evident in my post above, something like the Skai or the City Airbus hits the nail on the dot hands down ! ! !
It's not about helicopters vs Multicopter. There is room for both types, they forfill different roles, but since you are trying to compare the two.
First it's about mobility, these things can land in smaller areas than a conventional mammoth blade helicopters (again a helicopter has it's place but a multi cabn forfill a niche which helicopters simply cannot !
Second, with the appropriate use of advance prop designs, mainly aucustically sound reducing trirotor or 4 rotor blades,
These copters are just not as noisy.
A Helicopter produces an insane amount of noise compared to a multicopter ! And they have been flying since... forever !
Thirdly reducing maintenance.
If a multicopter motor fails,( it would by a very rare instance to begin with, same wrt an esc or battery, it would be changeable in under 10 minutes ! ! ! Increasing your up time and Profits ! !
Where as a helicopter have a complicated turbine engine, with a complicated gearbox and linkages, that needs to be vigilantly inspected consistently.
With Multirotors the main thing you will be changing is simply the bearings, how awesome is that ! ! !
I meant to say a "multi can" ie "a multicopter can"