Energy

Contra-rotating floating turbines promise unprecedented scale and power

View 4 Images
Contra-rotating vertical turbines could radically improve yield and reduce LCoE for floating offshore wind projects
World Wide Wind
Contra-rotating vertical turbines could radically improve yield and reduce LCoE for floating offshore wind projects
World Wide Wind
The top turbine, mounted to a central blade, spins in one direction, while the bottom, and the tower's exterior, spins in the other, with the generator at the bottom
World Wide Wind
The company says this design leaves much less turbulence behind it, allowing a much higher density of towers per given site
World Wide Wind
WWW claims its bottom-heavy, tilting, contra-rotating coaxial turbines solve offshore wind's scale limitations, and will grow to 400 m high, with a 40 MW capacity
World Wide Wind
View gallery - 4 images

Norway's World Wide Wind has a radically different take on offshore wind power. These floating, vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) feature two sets of blades, tuned to contra-rotate – and they promise more than double the output of today's biggest turbines.

Taking wind farms way offshore can certainly help make them less obtrusive, and open up a lot more opportunities – but as the ocean gets deeper, conventional horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) begin making less and less sense. HAWTs need to hold a lot of heavy components – drivetrains, gearboxes, generators and their colossal blades – right up the top of a long pole, so mounting them on floating platforms that don't want to tip over is a huge challenge – not to mention maintaining the business end of a turbine so far above the ground.

Some engineers and operators believe this could be a niche where VAWTs could shine instead. Their blades reach upward, but all their other heavy bits are at the bottom, so their natural tendency is to sit upright. Also, they can accept wind energy from any direction, rather than needing to turn to face into the wind, cutting down on some more heavy gear you'd find up high on a HAWT. They're typically far less efficient than a regular three-blade HAWT, sucking less energy out of a given breeze, but on the other hand, you can place them closer together without a drop in performance, meaning they could potentially suck more energy out of a given patch of ocean.

The top turbine, mounted to a central blade, spins in one direction, while the bottom, and the tower's exterior, spins in the other, with the generator at the bottom
World Wide Wind

And so to the device at hand. World Wide Wind has proposed an entirely new type of floating VAWT specifically designed for offshore deployment and massive scalability. Indeed, it's two VAWTs in one; the lower one is fixed to the outer casing of the tower, and set to rotate one way, and the upper one is mounted to a shaft running right up the middle of the tower, and it's set to rotate the other way.

Under the surface, one turbine is fixed to the rotor, the other to the "stator," doubling the relative speed of rotation as compared to a static stator, and generating a whole bunch of electricity we can burn our toast with. The company calls this a contra-rotating vertical turbine, or CRVT.

Again, the heaviest parts and the ones requiring most maintenance are at the bottom, below the buoyant pontoon, right down near where the tethers and power cable attach. But the whole thing isn't designed to sit perfectly upright; these enormous towers will tilt with the wind. World Wide Wind says this, and the blade designs, which sweep a conical area, helps to reduce the turbulent wake downstream of each floating tower, allowing operators to cram even more of these things into a given site. The ability to tilt will also help these things resist sudden, violent wind gusts and damaging vibrations.

The company says this design leaves much less turbulence behind it, allowing a much higher density of towers per given site
World Wide Wind

You need serious scale to get the best out of wind energy, and these guys aren't holding anything back on that front. The world's largest wind turbine as it stands is the mammoth MingYang Smart Energy 16.0-242. Standing 242 m (794 ft) tall, it has a rated capacity of 16 MW.

World Wide Wind plans to absolutely dwarf that piddly windmill. This design, says the company, is far easier to scale than any HAWT, and could grow up to a ridiculous 400 m (1,312 ft) in height, with a monster 40-megawatt capacity per unit. In an interview with Recharge, company representatives appear to have suggested a projected Levelized Cost of Energy (LCoE) of less than US$50 per megawatt – less than half the LCoE the US Energy Information Administration projects for the average offshore wind project going to market in 2027.

The company tells Recharge it's working to accelerate development of the CRVT through rapid prototyping. The targets are to have a 3-MW model up and running by 2026, and the big mama 40-MW machine as soon as 2029.

WWW claims its bottom-heavy, tilting, contra-rotating coaxial turbines solve offshore wind's scale limitations, and will grow to 400 m high, with a 40 MW capacity
World Wide Wind

Will it work? It's hard to say. The startup provides no supporting research, or evidence that it's tested micro-scale prototypes. It's unclear why the company hasn't gone with Darrieus-style turbine blades, which connect back to the central axis at the top, and tend to be both structurally stronger and more efficient. One wonders about longevity, since all VAWT blades are subjected to strong forces from every angle as they spin – and about the efficiency losses, lifespan and replacement procedures for the gigantic bearings you'd need to support and spin a 400-meter-long shaft inside a counter-rotating 400-meter-long tube, with the mass tilted off-center most of the time. In seawater, of course, for decades.

Not to mention, it's apparently getting hard to find test locations for wind tech in the North Sea, because there are too many other test projects "almost queueing up" in the region, according to Norway's Teknisk Ukeblad.

On the positive side, there's not a tie to be seen amongst the leadership team, so clearly they're feeling confident and relaxed about this whole thing. World Wide Wind claims partnerships with Uppsala University, Sinted, North Wind, Kjeller Vindteknik, Norwegian Energy Partners, and the Norwegian Offshore Wind Cluster.

As with all clean energy moonshot projects, we desperately want to believe. The expansion and decarbonization of worldwide energy grids cannot possibly happen fast enough, as climate change enters its terrible toddler phase and the unthinkable consequences start becoming impossible to ignore. Giant 40-megawatt coaxial towers way out at sea, undercutting the LCoE of today's offshore wind, could make a huge contribution in the existential battle of the coming century. But we don't need renders, diagrams and promises, we need tangible results – and we need them yesterday.

We reached out to World Wide Wind to learn more, and have now published an enlightening, in-depth follow-up interview with the core team.

Source: World Wide Wind via Recharge

View gallery - 4 images
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
17 comments
Demosthenes
My latest knowledge is that wind turbines with vertical axes are generally less efficient than those with horizontal axes. The reason is that one rotor blade is always returned AGAINST the wind. I do not see any improvement in the system presented here.
jerryd
that won't produce cost effective power. And not sure why they think this is an improvement on standard WTs as not likely to make 20% of a normal one.
The blades seem to be working as conical shaped HAWT though only 2 blades would be in air as the 3rd is near flat to the water, airflow can't make power.
It's power transmission has huge hurdles to overcome spinning the whole tower, really.
Counter rotating can work as a HAWT with 1 blade in front and the other behind the generator pod and if one is connected to the alternator 'stator' and the other to the alternator shaft, it can double the rotation speed which helps keep alternator size, cost down.
Plus the efficiency goes up 20% or so on the blades from the same swept aera or smaller for the same power.
michael39
Less efficient than HAWT and those are already notorious for rarely ever producing anything near their rated output. What about the millions of sea birds that in all probably, will be chopped to bits? No one seems to mention the environmental down sides of wind turbines. Similar to vegans and vegetarians who never mention all the animals that are killed during the cultivation and production of their soybeans and kale.
paul314
Maybe they have trouble testing at smaller scales because you need to get well above to water surface to get good-quality wind?
Captain Obvious
Efficiency is immaterial when your "fuel" is free.
aksdad
If only we were more advanced technologically and could efficiently produce vast amounts of electricity with no air pollution or carbon dioxide emissions and very little waste material in powerplants that require only a few acres of land and are easy to locate close to where the power is needed...
Nelson Hyde Chick
Couldn't the rocking motion also be utilized as wave power?
Brucce Perens
The main problem here is that two very long rotating shafts must bear the very large force of the rotors and bring it down to the generating system on the ground. These shafts would not necessarily be lighter than the entire generator, or use less material. Rather than mechanical motion, having the generator at the top and sending electricity down is likely to be more efficient. And there is the problem mentioned by "Demosthenes" too.

Regardless of the statement of "Captain Obvious", efficiency is very important even though wind is "free". Wind turbines aren't cheap, and they wear out, and efficiency means more watts per dollar over the life of the turbine.
TechGazer
Standard response: build one, set it in the real-world environment it's meant to be in, compile data, and then after enough years, you'll be able to compare its return on investment. Investors want data to make their decisions on.
fredricwilliams
When talking of climate change, instead of "unthinkable consequences" "impossible to ignore" and "existential battle," why not take a deep breath and see just what has happened over the past 140 years of rising temperatures. More food, more people, better health, greening of the planet and far greater prosperity. It is only by looking at what actually happens -- rather than speculating about what might possibly happen -- that we remain grounded. Wind, solar, geothermal -- all lovely ideas which have been the subject of great interest and government largesse for the nearly half century since I handled public affairs for the Energy Research and Development Agency while at NASA. Still not quite there, and yet we still are all alive and carrying on.