Health & Wellbeing

Meat's damaged DNA damages your own to raise cancer risk, says study

Meat's damaged DNA damages your own to raise cancer risk, says study
New research suggests a previously unknown mechanism for how red meat cooked at high temperatures could increase the risk of cancer
New research suggests a previously unknown mechanism for how red meat cooked at high temperatures could increase the risk of cancer
View 1 Image
New research suggests a previously unknown mechanism for how red meat cooked at high temperatures could increase the risk of cancer
1/1
New research suggests a previously unknown mechanism for how red meat cooked at high temperatures could increase the risk of cancer

It’s no secret that red meat and fried foods aren’t great for your health, but Stanford scientists have discovered a new potential mechanism for why. The team found that cooking food at high heat damages its DNA, and that in turn could damage your own DNA, raising the risk of cancer and other health problems.

While red meat has some nutritional value, higher consumption has been linked to increased risk of heart disease, certain cancers, and other chronic illnesses. The WHO classifies it as a Group 2A “probable” carcinogenic, thanks to cancer-causing chemicals and molecules that can form during processing or even cooking. In a new study, scientists at Stanford report a previously unknown potential mechanism by which meat and fried foods could increase a consumer’s cancer risk.

It might not be something we think about, but most food contains DNA – after all, meat, fruit, vegetables, fish, poultry, grains, nuts, mushrooms etc all come from once-living things. And when these foods are cooked at high temperatures, that DNA sustains damage. The researchers on the new study have found that components of this damaged DNA could potentially trigger mutations in the DNA of a consumer.

Other studies have found that charring and/or frying foods can cause DNA damage in consumers, but in those cases the culprit is thought to be damaging molecules called reactive species that form in higher amounts in the body after eating these foods. The researchers on the new study, however, say that the newly discovered mechanism would likely be a bigger driver of DNA damage because nucleotides from our foods’ DNA are more readily incorporated into our own cells during digestion.

“We have shown that cooking can damage DNA in food, and have discovered that consumption of this DNA may be a source of genetic risk,” said Eric Kool, senior author of the study. “We don’t doubt that the small molecules identified in prior studies are indeed dangerous. But what has never been documented before our study is the potentially large quantities of heat-damaged DNA available for uptake into a consumer’s own DNA.”

The team tested their hypothesis on lab-grown human cells and in mice. First, they cooked ground beef, ground pork and potatoes in two different ways – boiling at 100 °C (212 °F) for 15 minutes, or roasting at 220 °C (430 °F) for 20 minutes. Then, they extracted DNA from the foods and examined the damage it had sustained.

They found that the higher temperatures induced higher levels of DNA damage in the food, and that the potatoes took less damage than the meat, for reasons that remain unknown. The two most common types of DNA damage they observed in the samples are known to be toxic in a way that can lead to cancer.

Next, the researchers exposed mice and human cells to the food’s heat-damaged DNA, and used a fluorescent tool to image areas of DNA damage in the recipient cells. And sure enough, they found significant DNA damage in the lab-grown cells, and in the small intestines of the mice.

While the research is intriguing and concerning, the team acknowledges that there’s still plenty of work to be done before this link can be definitively made in humans. The team plans to investigate with a broader range of foods and cooking methods, as well as how long-term low doses, as you’d expect over a real-world lifetime, might affect human health differently than short-term high doses tested in this study.

“Our study raises a lot of questions about an entirely unexplored, yet possibly substantial chronic health risk from eating foods that are grilled, fried, or otherwise prepared with high heat,” said Kool. “We don’t yet know where these initial findings will lead, and we invite the wider research community to build upon them.”

The research was published in the journal ACS Central Science.

Source: Stanford

11 comments
11 comments
StanislawZolczynski
This suggestions should be supported by investigation of populations known of consuming big amount of roasted meat.
pbethel
I wonder if stomach acid damages the DNA of the food we eat?
TechGazer
Did the previous food scare run out of steam? This is a creative hypothesis, without any real statistics to support its claims. Mixing cooked food with some cells in a petri dish is not the same as what happens when a person eats food. If their theory was true, there would be statistical evidence from thousands of years of humans eating lots of cooked meat (and other foods). Since those statistics don't seem to show a major threat, it's not something to worry about.
akarp
"It’s no secret that red meat and fried foods aren’t great for your health" LOL very, very wrong! Processed meats with chemicals are unhealthy...but not fresh meats.
ARF!
wait, so doesn't that mean that our intricately crinkled brains that we develovolved from cooking & eating crustaceans and mollusks are just deeply massive giant cancers all of their own kind?! explains a lot.
P51d007
Good! You stop eating it, there will be more for the ones that do and the price will come down.
soundnado
For millions of years, humans ate natural foods.
Catweazle
Dear me, they never give up, do they?

"While red meat has some nutritional value..." indeed!

Hardly surprising, considering that human dentition and digestive systems have evolved to extract the nourishment from it.

Considering the length of time humans have been eating meat cooked originally over open fires in order to render it more consumable and digestible, I rather think any major ill effects would have become apparent long, long before the advent of experiments on mouse cells in petri dishes!
aksdad
The author refers to a study specifically examining meats cured with nitrites and the role nitrites might have in tumor formation to support the sweeping statement that "red meat and fried foods aren't great for your health". Interesting leap in logic. And we've seen the "cooking meat at high heat causes cancer" plot many times before. Much like the endless "time travel" plots in entertainment, it remains in the realm of interesting speculation. In case it wasn't obvious, high heat damages food in numerous ways, like beneficially destroying toxins, viruses, and bacteria to render it edible. I'll take my steak well-done over raw every time.
see3d
Very interesting! I wonder how much our modern diets have changed in the last several hundred years. Are we exposed to more processing and high-heat cooking of meat and higher volumes of high-heat cooked meat in modern times? Boiling of meats as in stews would not be a problem then. Ancient diet research correlated to rates of cancer over time may give us a clue.
Load More