Materials

Reusable bricks could build and rebuild houses like Lego

Reusable bricks could build and rebuild houses like Lego
A crew rebuilds a test structure made from the reusable bricks, after having fully dismantled it
A crew rebuilds a test structure made from the reusable bricks, after having fully dismantled it
View 3 Images
The test structure, after it had initially been built from the reusable bricks
1/3
The test structure, after it had initially been built from the reusable bricks
A crew rebuilds a test structure made from the reusable bricks, after having fully dismantled it
2/3
A crew rebuilds a test structure made from the reusable bricks, after having fully dismantled it
The test structure after being fully reassembled
3/3
The test structure after being fully reassembled
View gallery - 3 images

Demolition of old structures at the end of their service life results in large amounts of waste and carbon emissions, not to mention the labor involved and the cost of producing new materials. According to official statistics, construction and demolition waste accounts for more than one third of all waste generated in Europe.

A team from Austria's Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) questioned if there might be a better, more sustainable approach to dealing with old brick buildings. What if instead of being demolished, they could be carefully deconstructed, so that the bricks could be reused in future construction projects?

This concept is similar to taking apart a Lego structure and rebuilding it elsewhere with the same parts. Obviously, using conventional mortar is not going to work in such a case. Instead of binding bricks together permanently, the researchers developed prefabricated brick wall elements connected through so-called reversible joints.

As of now, there is unfortunately not much information disclosed about the design or any technical details of the reversible joints. We've reached out to the researchers, but are still waiting to hear back.

The test structure, after it had initially been built from the reusable bricks
The test structure, after it had initially been built from the reusable bricks

The bricks used in the project are 44 cm (17.3 in) thick and contain insulating wool for improved thermal performance. These wall elements are pre-plastered at the factory, which reduces the amount of work required on the construction site.

One of the main goals behind the project was to reduce emissions from construction materials, and, according to project manager Hans Hafellner from the Institute of Building Physics, Services and Construction at TU Graz, the results look very promising.

“The results of our research to date show that a significant proportion of total emissions can be avoided during the second phase of use through reuse by developing an innovative jointing solution," he says. "Considering three life cycles, CO₂ emissions can be reduced by around 60% compared to conventional construction methods.”

Permanent mortar is what typically provides structural stability to a whole building, and since it could not be used, the engineers at TU Graz had to develop alternative methods to ensure the same safety standards.

This became one of the main challenges for the research team, and they came up with two solutions: stability can be achieved either through a roof that is heavy enough to stabilize the entire structure, or through vertically pre-stressed threaded rods that run through the bricks. Both methods reportedly provide the necessary structural strength, meet all safety regulations, and still allow the walls to be dismantled when required and reused for new buildings.

The test structure after being fully reassembled
The test structure after being fully reassembled

The idea was tested using a demonstrator building. After being dismantled and reconstructed at a different location, the new structure was fully functional and met all the requirements.

The concept of a circular economy is at the core of this project, which means that resources can be reused multiple times instead of just creating more waste. If adopted on a global scale, this solution will not only have a positive impact on the environment but also benefit the economy by increasing the residual value of buildings at the end of their service life.

Source: TU Graz

View gallery - 3 images
3 comments
3 comments
paul314
The big thing (as this project seems to demonstrate) isn't the bricks, it's the mortar. If you use a mortar that's strong enough to bond the bricks into a solid structural unit, then it's also going to break the bricks when you try to take the building apart, or adhere so tightly that you can't economically get it off. So you need some other force (tensioned bars/cables, heavy roofs) to hold things together if you use a less-aggressive mortar.
This is also true for wooden structure: if you use adhesives that are strong than the wood, then you can't take your thing apart without breaking the wood.
Brian Beban
I have doubts about the real-world ability of this, as the bricks would be subject to chipping and cracking with the repeated handling during dismantling, storage and re-use. Anyone who has tried to reuse cement or clay bricks should be aware of this problem. As well, there is the issue of the cleanliness of the reused product if exposed to mould, dirt, abrasion, and upkeep items like paint.
TechGazer
Why standard block size? Looking at the trial structure, it could be replaced by 4 cast walls, locked together by mechanical fittings. Bricks and cinderblocks were sized for human handling, which isn't going to continue for much longer. There are already many construction methods that use larger panels. Panels made from wood (or bamboo) work well too, and are greener.
There's also the target market to consider. If used for houses, the bricks would most likely get contaminated (paint, spills, etc), making them less easily reusable. For commercial buildings, ugly unfinished concrete is less of a problem, but again, larger panels would be a better choice.
Maybe there's a use for it, but it seems like a silly concept to me.