Materials

This startup's squeezable solid could upend cooling and refrigeration – cheaply

This startup's squeezable solid could upend cooling and refrigeration – cheaply
If Barocal sticks the landing, the fridges of the future could use solid-state refrigerants that won't harm our environment
If Barocal sticks the landing, the fridges of the future could use solid-state refrigerants that won't harm our environment
View 4 Images
If Barocal sticks the landing, the fridges of the future could use solid-state refrigerants that won't harm our environment
1/4
If Barocal sticks the landing, the fridges of the future could use solid-state refrigerants that won't harm our environment
Barocal founder Xavier Moya with crystals of a solid-state refrigerant his company's developing
2/4
Barocal founder Xavier Moya with crystals of a solid-state refrigerant his company's developing
Barocal is exploring the use of its refrigerant in large-scale HVAC systems where it can significantly impact energy use
3/4
Barocal is exploring the use of its refrigerant in large-scale HVAC systems where it can significantly impact energy use
Barocal's refrigerant applies the barocaloric effect, in which a material absorbs heat when it's at rest and releases that heat when it's compressed
4/4
Barocal's refrigerant applies the barocaloric effect, in which a material absorbs heat when it's at rest and releases that heat when it's compressed
View gallery - 4 images

A startup founded by a material physicist has been working for the past seven years to change the way we cool our food and interior spaces, and it's now taken a big step toward that goal.

Here's the short version: instead of an ozone-depleting substance that can leak out and cause enormous damage to the environment, Barocal is developing a class of solid materials that can absorb and transfer heat when subjected to pressure, with a high degree of efficiency and safety. Expect to see these in action in refrigerators and air conditioning systems.

TechCrunch reported the company, founded by University of Cambridge professor Xavier Moya, has just raised US$10 million to commercialize its solution. That's on top of the $4.5 million in funding it had previously received from the European Innovation Council and a $1 million prize in the TERA-Award energy solutions competition, so this fresh injection will likely help accelerate its efforts.

Barocal founder Xavier Moya with crystals of a solid-state refrigerant his company's developing
Barocal founder Xavier Moya with crystals of a solid-state refrigerant his company's developing

To understand Barocal's approach, let's first look at how refrigeration works. Today's fridges circulate a liquid refrigerant (typically a greenhouse gas) through coils inside the fridge's cold compartment. As it evaporates into a gas, it absorbs heat from the food and air around it, cooling the interior. The refrigerant gas is drawn into a compressor, which pressurizes and heats it. The hot pressurized gas flows through coils on the back of the fridge, where a fan helps dissipate the heat to the outside air. As it cools, the gas condenses back into a liquid, and this passes through an expansion valve which reduces pressure, and it then flows back to the evaporator coils. The cycle then repeats in this loop.

Barocal is working on an inexpensive solid-state refrigerant in the form of plastic crystals which have molecules freely rotating inside them at rest, and can absorb heat in that state – and their temperature can stably vary by 90 ºF (50 ºC).

When they're compressed, the molecules stop rotating, and the crystals give off heat. Transferring heat out from a fridge can be achieved by flowing water past the material toward a radiator where said heat can dissipate.

Barocal's refrigerant applies the barocaloric effect, in which a material absorbs heat when it's at rest and releases that heat when it's compressed
Barocal's refrigerant applies the barocaloric effect, in which a material absorbs heat when it's at rest and releases that heat when it's compressed

It's basically the barocaloric effect at work – hence the firm's name. This could negate the need to use greenhouse gases for cooling, which can not only cause outsized global warming effects when they leak out, but are also energy inefficient and require plenty of electricity (used in your refrigerator's compressor).

It's worth noting that Moya and his team aren't the only ones working on this tech. AFP noted last year that several groups are developing cooling solutions along these lines, and we covered a Harvard team working on this back in 2022. In fact, the University of Cambridge had a program focused on this for 15 years before Barocal formed.

If this company can stick the landing, it could pave the way for massive reductions in energy demand for cooling, as well as the elimination of those nasty greenhouse gases from the billions of refrigerators and air conditioners the world is going to need in the coming decades.

Barocal is exploring the use of its refrigerant in large-scale HVAC systems where it can significantly impact energy use
Barocal is exploring the use of its refrigerant in large-scale HVAC systems where it can significantly impact energy use

Barocal is presently exploring the application of its waxy solid refrigerant in commercial-grade HVAC and refrigeration systems. Beyond developing the material, there's a lot of engineering required to make these cooling systems compact, efficient, cost-effective, and quiet.

The company noted last year it was trialing its tech with multiple international companies, and aimed to have a product out within three years, so hopefully we're not in for a long wait before we can experience the fridge of the future.

Source: Barocal via TechCrunch

View gallery - 4 images
6 comments
6 comments
Cromulent Corpuscle
CFCs and HCFCs are not greenhouse gases. They have been shown to deplete Ozone
TechGazer
Heat pumps, such as refrigerators, don't need to use ozone-depleting gasses; there are many other options for the refrigerant. CFCs or HCFCs aren't even the most efficient. They're simply the least likely to result in lawsuits due to leakage. Other gasses, such as propane or ammonia have a small risk of fire, explosion, or toxicity. I'm not sure of the exact risk figures, but there's not much refrigerant involved, so it shouldn't be all that much of a risk, considering all the other potential fire/explosion/toxic hazards in a kitchen. Corporate lawyers want zero risk, so environmentally harmful refrigerants are chosen.
I'm in favour of alternatives to the (Rankine cycle?) cooling systems. This news article claims superior efficiency, but doesn't include any figures, so that's questionable. There's also the question of durability of the equipment compressing and releasing the material. I'm guessing that it cycles slower than regular refrigerators, so noise might be less. How does this compare with the magnetocaloric refrigeration systems also claimed as a competitor?
Username
CFC's were phased out in North America 20 plus years ago. There's very little info here, how is the material compressed?
Joe
So little information, or details like current efficiency (probably very low) and practical or theoretical efficiency. Annoying. Also as stated, modern refrigerants do not need to impact ozone at all. GWP (Will warming potential) is an important metric, as they will likely leak in their lifetime in an appliance and even a small amount can be equivalent of a car driven for an entire year in GWP. But GWPs are also coming down a lot in newer refrigerants... So give a fair comparison of tech and don't fear monger about ozone... You have an audience that is too smart for that sorta crap
Trylon
@Cromulent Corpuscle. They have both ozone depletion AND global warming properties. Most current refrigerants have hundreds to thousands of times more global warming potential compared to CO2.
S Redford
Hydrocarbon refrigerants have low GWP, E.g. Propane (R290) ~3. Non-flammable HFO refrigerants are typically <4. Neither type has any appreciable ozone depletion effect.
Refrigeration and heat pumps (Reverse Rankine cycle) have good efficiencies where heat transfer is significantly greater than electrical power input. For refrigerators and freezers, I would be surprised if there was a significant improvement in efficiency when the limiting factor is device insulation.
The lack of detail in this article doesn’t give any clue to the claimed improvement in efficiency compared to reverse Rankine cycle. However, in a France 24 article it is claimed, “…estimates that these devices have the potential to reduce emissions by up to 75 percent …..”. Some solid facts would be useful!
For heat pumps and air conditioning, the physical needs for split indoor and outdoor units may add further challenges to new technologies.