Materials

Steel rebar may have met its match – in the form of wavy plastic

Steel rebar may have met its match – in the form of wavy plastic
A section of concrete reinforced with traditional rebar (right) and the experimental new wavy PLA (left)
A section of concrete reinforced with traditional rebar (right) and the experimental new wavy PLA (left)
View 2 Images
A section of concrete reinforced with traditional rebar (right) and the experimental new wavy PLA (left)
1/2
A section of concrete reinforced with traditional rebar (right) and the experimental new wavy PLA (left)
An infographic outlining the team's findings
2/2
An infographic outlining the team's findings

Who could possibly compare to Superman, the Man of Steel? Definitely not a man of plastic! Right? Wrong. Researchers at the University of Sharjah, UAE, have discovered that plastics, in certain shapes, may perform as well as steel bars as reinforcement materials in concrete.

In a study that was as much about the shape of the material as the material itself, the researchers 3D-printed and tested various material configurations, finding that certain shapes outperformed others by up to 500% in specific tests.

Concrete, which primarily comprises cement, water, and aggregates, is the most used construction material in the world. This composite is often upgraded with steel reinforcement to a stronger version called reinforced concrete.

Over the past century, steel has proven to be a highly effective concrete reinforcement material, so much so that more than 20% of the almost 2 billion tonnes of global steel produced annually is used to reinforce concrete.

Now, despite its celebrity and effectiveness, steel presents numerous drawbacks. For starters, it is heavy. A cubic yard of reinforced concrete typically contains 150 to 250 pounds (68 to 113 kg) of steel; figures can rise to well over 300 lb (136 kg) in heavily reinforced applications. Steel is also susceptible to corrosion, which can compromise structural integrity over time.

Finally, steel has an enormous environmental footprint. Its production, from mining and refining to shaping, transporting, and assembling, requires enormous amounts of energy. This energy-intensive process contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, making steel one of the most carbon-intensive materials in construction.

Given all these downsides, researchers have been developing alternative reinforcement materials, such as glass fiber-reinforced polymers and carbon fiber-reinforced polymers, for years.

The University of Sharjah researchers turned to a far more accessible but less likely material: polylactic acid (PLA), a biodegradable thermoplastic. In the study, the researchers focused not only on the material but also on the shape of the reinforcements.

Cylindrical bars have been the go-to shape for both steel and its alternatives. But what do other shapes have to offer? This is one of the major questions the researchers set out to answer.

Using 3D printing, they produced flat, platelike structures and wavy, serrated, and triangular patterns designed to grip the concrete more effectively and improve stress transfer. They then tested these shapes against traditionally straight PLA bars. The findings were outstanding, with the unconventional shapes significantly outperforming more traditional bars.

“Plates outperform bars. Beams reinforced with PLA plates achieved up to twice the peak load capacity and absorbed up to five times more energy (toughness) than those using simple PLA bars. The increased surface area of the plates allowed for a much stronger bond with the concrete,” explained Dr. Muhammad Junaid, head of the research.

An infographic outlining the team's findings
An infographic outlining the team's findings

The study published in the journal Construction and Building Materials also revealed that the triangular and wavy forms significantly enhanced the beam's ability to handle post-cracking stress. “These serrated shapes acted like teeth, locking into the concrete to prevent slipping,” Dr. Junaid explained.

In PLA vs PLA tests, the plates and the wavy reinforcements outperformed their bar counterparts. But how did they hold up against steel? Quite well. The researchers found that a combination of shapes, forming triangular wavy plates, was most effective. Concrete reinforced with these plates matched its steel-reinforced counterpart in ductility. The triangular wavy PLA plates also achieved up to 80% of the bending strength of a traditional steel-reinforced beam. Not bad at all, considering the additional benefits.

Steel has been used in construction concrete for quite some time now, and we probably won't see it vanish any time soon. However, the study demonstrated yet another potentially viable alternative for certain applications. PLA is biodegradable, corrosion-resistant, much lighter than steel, and generally much more sustainable. There's also the customization on demand angle using 3D printing. It is important to note, however, that the study was done using small-scale prototypes.

Source: University of Sharjah via AlphaGalileo

8 comments
8 comments
Matt Lechner
,,,, looks interesting, seems that people have identified some possible advantages to it. Can't help but wonder how a wavy piece of plastic will perform in situations where the reinforcing component, which would otherwise be rebar - how will a wavy piece of plastic compare in a situation where the rebar would be helping the concrete to "resist" forces of tension (pulling apart type forces). the resistance would have to be coming from the shape of the plastic, I guess, not tensile-force resistance of material itself. In other words, if you pull on the two ends of a piece of wavy plastic, the piece will stretch. In contrast, a hefty piece of rebar will not stretch much at all, and that kind of strengthening is very helpful to the strength of concrete in some situations. For example, say you suspended a reinforced concrete beam in the middle of a building, and for whatever reason, some force emerged (ice build-up maybe) or possibly some kind of defect in another building component, that caused the building to "sqash down" some, and try to "bow out" in the middle (where your reinforced beam is located). We know that the rebar would be a huge help in this situation, because #1 the concrete is dry and has "grabbed onto" the rebar, and #2 the rebar by itself is very resistant to tensile (pulling type) forces. Would the wavy piece of plastic be able to overcome its inherent lesser ability to autonomously "resist" tensile forces, or would it just "not work well" for a situation like that, where the conventional rebar would be very stoutly resisting the tensile force ? If you pull on the ends of a piece of 1/2" rebar, it's not going to stretch much. If you pull on the ends of a wavy piece of plastic, it's going to stretch a lot. Does something happen "inside" the plastic-reinforced beam that overcomes this problem ?
MQ
PLA is not an engineering polymer, also what of the elastic, thermal and chemical/mechanical bonding/ cohesion of other mechanical properties?? ?? Re compatibility of a brittle matrix like concrete, reinforced with low modulus elastic materials like low strength thermoplastics
This study demonstrates that engineered, strain-optimised reinforcing members have a future in construction, finding non corroding / spall inducing, compatible reinforcing is the key to reducing lifecycle costs in the built environment. ?? Prestressed continuous Basalt fibre, in temperature inert non organic cement matrix. (The need for preload for reinforcing to work optimally, does not lend itself to complex internal shapes for high stress (energy efficient) designs. (Floppy reinforcing does not prevent tension cracking of brittle matrices.)
Techutante
Now imagine if it was 3D printed literally anything else how good it would be. Must everything be plastic down to the bones?
DARREN DEHAVEN
This leads to the question, what is the best shape for steel? Would wavy plates of steel do better than steel bars for reinforcing concrete?
DARREN DEHAVEN
Would wavy plates of steel do better than steel bars?
TechGazer
I'd like a structural engineer's opinion of this. I can imagine that some tests could be done to give impressive claims, but which wouldn't hold up in real-life applications. As I understand it, the rebar provides tensile strength, and I don't think a wavy strip of plastic will do the same, allowing the concrete to crack.
Username
Rebar is used in grids and 3d configuration which provides support in all directions. Can these wavy strips be used the same way? In the drawings they seem like they only provide reinforcement in one plane.
martinwinlow
Um ... 'thermo-plastic'... Fire performance, then...? I *do* hope this rather obvious factor hasn't been overlooked in all the excitement...