AI & Humanoids

OpenAI and Figure join the race to humanoid robot workers

OpenAI has invested in Norway's 1X Technologies, which expects to launch its Neo robot (left) in the coming months. Meanwhile, Figure is working on the Figure 1 humanoid robot (right) in the USA
1X technologies / Figure
OpenAI has invested in Norway's 1X Technologies, which expects to launch its Neo robot (left) in the coming months. Meanwhile, Figure is working on the Figure 1 humanoid robot (right) in the USA
1X technologies / Figure

Humanoid robots built around cutting-edge AI brains promise shocking, disruptive change to labor markets and the wider global economy – and near-unlimited investor returns to whoever gets them right at scale. Big money is now flowing into the sector.

The jarring emergence of ChatGPT has made it clear: AIs are advancing at a wild and accelerating pace, and they're beginning to transform industries based around desk jobs that typically marshall human intelligence. They'll begin taking over portions of many white-collar jobs in the coming years, leading initially to huge increases in productivity, and eventually, many believe, to huge increases in unemployment.

If you're coming out of school right now and looking to be useful, blue collar work involving actual physical labor might be a better bet than anything that'd put you behind a desk.

But on the other hand, it's starting to look like a general-purpose humanoid robot worker might be closer than anyone thinks, imbued with light-speed, swarm-based learning capabilities to go along with GPT-version-X communication abilities, a whole internet's worth of knowledge, and whatever physical attributes you need for a given job.

Such humanoids will begin as dumbass job-site apprentices with zero common sense, but they'll learn – at a frightening pace, if the last few months in AI has been any kind of indication. They'll be available 24/7, power sources permitting, gradually expanding their capabilities and overcoming their limitations until they begin displacing humans. They could potentially crash the cost of labor, leading to enormous gains in productivity – and a fundamental upheaval of the blue-collar labor market at a size and scale limited mainly by manufacturing, materials, and what kinds of jobs they're capable of taking over.

The best-known humanoid to date has been Atlas, by Boston Dynamics. Atlas has shown impressive progress over the last 10 years. But Atlas is a research platform, and Boston Dynamics founder Marc Raibert has been clear that the company is in no rush to take humanoids to the mass market.

"We have to remove the pressure to make things more reliable, more manufacturable, and cheaper in the short term," he told IEE Spectrum last year. "Those are things that are important, but they’re in the way of trying new things. The pitch I made to [parent company] Hyundai explicitly says that, and proposes funding that extends long enough that we’re not distracted in the short term."

Hanson Robotics and Engineered Arts, among others, have focused on human/robot interaction, concentrating on making humanoids like Sophia and Ameca, with lifelike and expressive faces. Ameca in particular communicates using the GPT language model.

Others are absolutely focused on getting these things into mass usage as quickly as possible. Elon Musk announced Tesla's entry into humanoid robotics in 2021, and the company appears to have made pretty decent progress on the Optimus prototypes for its Tesla Bot in the intervening months.

"It's probably the least understood or appreciated part of what we're doing at Tesla," he told investors last month. "But it will probably be worth significantly more than the car side of things long-term."

Tesla's Optimus robot is now walking and using its humanoid hands for basic tasks
Tesla

Just this year, entrepreneur Brett Adcock, founder of the Vettery "online talent marketplace," and more recently Archer Aviation, one of the leading contenders in the emerging electric VTOL aircraft movement, announced his latest venture is focused on humanoid robots.

The first phase of a Musk-like "master plan" for the new company, Figure, aims first to "build a feature-complete electromechanical humanoid," then to "perform human-like maipulation," then to "integrate humanoids into the labor force."

Figure aims to create "the world’s first commercially viable general purpose humanoid robot" – at this stage called the Figure 01. This fella will stand 5 foot 6 inches (168 cm) tall and weigh 132 lb (60 kg) according to the company. It'll be able to lift a targeted 44 lb (20 kg) of "payload," walk at speeds up to 1.2 m/s (2.7 mph/4.3 km/h), and operate for up to five hours on a charge.

As a two-legged humanoid, it'll be able to climb stairs, walk around, and generally operate in most of the environments humans can – at least, eventually. With humanlike hands and body mechanics, it should be able to use the tools we use, and do a variety of our jobs.

Adcock is approaching this project with trademark speed and aggression. When Archer launched, it hired a bunch of talent away from other leading eVTOL companies and made very quick progress, both technically and in terms of fundraising. Indeed, according to the AAM Reality Index, Archer is now the third-best-funded eVTOL company in the world, and looks likely to have aircraft in service in 2025, around the same time as Joby Aviation. Joby was founded in 2009, and Archer came out of stealth in 2020.

Figure appears to be taking the same approach; according to an interview with IEEE Spectrum, the company had more than 40 engineers on board at the beginning of March, with key talent from the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Boston Dynamics, Tesla, Waymo and Google X, among others. So while the company doesn't seem to have anything actually built yet, it's a serious venture proceeding at top speed.

"We face high risk and extremely low chances of success," reads the Figure website. "However, if we are successful, we have the potential to positively impact humanity and to build the largest company on the planet."

Meanwhile, OpenAI has signaled it's getting interested in humanoids again as well. OpenAI wants to create an "artificial general intelligence" or AGI – a machine that can do nearly all tasks better than a human. Through the GPT language model, the company expects to knock a lot off that list in the short term future, but it'll need to put its intelligence in a body to handle the rest.

OpenAI had its own robotics division for many years, and indeed built a humanoid hand capable of fine manipulation and sensing that used neural networks and reinforcement learning to figure out how to solve a Rubik's cube, one-handed.

But the company shut down its robotics team in 2021, telling VentureBeat that it was focusing its efforts in the area where it was progressing fastest – generative AI and large language models like GPT. The key difference, according to co-founder Wojciech Zaremba, is data and computing power. The AI-powered robots proved capable of learning physical tasks "extremely well" – there's just far more text training data than robot-relevant video data, and text is much faster for a neural model to process.

So text is where they focused their efforts, and the results are hard to argue with; OpenAI now has the fastest-growing platform in history, a game-changing breakthrough of the highest order in the GPT language model.

But through an investment in Norwegian company 1X, formerly known as Halodi Robotics, it seems OpenAI is ready to get back into embodied intelligence. Details are scant at this point; 1X announced the close of a US$23.5 million Series A2 funding round on March 23rd, led by the OpenAI Startup Fund.

Halodi made a certain amount of progress with its Eve robot, a humanoid on a wheeled base, a version of which can be seen in the video above. But a wheeled robot is a limited one, in terms of the human tasks it can take over, and 1X is now focused on a bipedal platform called Neo, to "explore how artificial intelligence can take form in a human-like body."

It looks somewhat similar to Figure's design, in that it appears to use electric actuators rather than hydraulics, it runs a screen for a face, and it uses humanoid hands.

The company has little more to say at this point, other than the words "Summer 2023," which appears to indicate we'll be meeting Neo-on-legs very soon. It'll be fascinating to see what OpenAI's contributions will bring to a project like this.

This space could well become the next high-tech gold rush, since as both Tesla and Figure point out, whoever gets a general-purpose humanoid out there first, that's capable of doing real work across a decently broad set of tasks, is in an amazing position to generate near-unlimited money and value.

Workers tend to be much cheaper to buy than to hire. Some of the most shameful chapters in human history demonstrate how much wealth can be generated if you own a subservient, non-unionized workforce that operates under zero OHS requirements, requires no pay or sick leave, and can be told to handle a range of different tasks.

A humanoid robotics revolution could deliver a lot of the same benefits in a much more morally defensible way – although if it's successful enough (and it seems it will be, it's just a matter of when) – it'll open its own Pandora's box of societal consequences.

Of course, the human form certainly isn't optimized to get today's work done, so at some stage it'll start making sense to create superhuman robots that are faster and stronger than the best of us, with greater reach, extra legs and arms, and completely different form factors. And that's when things will start getting really weird and scary.

Sources: 1X, Figure

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
10 comments
Daishi
I've been a vocal critic of biped robots for as long as I can remember. People have been telling me I am wrong about them for decades at this point. I think where these probably deliver the most value and why OpenAI would be interested is in having one of these things stand there and speak to people. I think just giving ChatGPT a body would be interesting enough for companies to buy one to interact with guests and clients for a wow factor.
Joy Parr
Another great piece from Loz Blain and New Atlas, thanks you guys!
It does look more and more as though the end of the world of work is coming soon, so we'll need to adapt our societies to that. That Rubik's cube video should be enough to clinch the argument for anybody. (Disclaimer: I'm trusting you guys not to deepfake us here, lol! :-)
Two of those hands on an extant Atlas or a future Figure robot, an OpenAI LLM overseeing operations, and a subordinate neural network for each hand, looks like doing the job. I really don't think it can be long now.
Bob Flint
The one handed rubic cube solver, way too slow, the last one picking up separate blocks, doesn't think, lower the box to below the table edge, one swipe all parts fall into the box done least than 2 seconds.

Come on really compare the millions of Chinese people working for peanuts, the power alone on any of these "Robots" costs more than a single person, that can think on the fly. Not to mention the actual robot cost itself.

Cheap labor still has the edge on these, tech likely needs decades more development, certain sectors yes, hazardous environments, space, etc.....
Cymon Curcumin
I’ve worked with co-op placements with significant cognitive disabilities—to the point where they need an assistant to help them do most things. They aren’t brought in for their productivity but to try to help them learn some basic skills. The most profoundly challenged kids still would put perform a humanoid robot, even if the robot had an assistant working with them. Maybe that will change in time but at the moment there is no chance of a humanoid robot exceeding an average human’s capacity—even without the lunch breaks and sleeping.
IkaikaW
I've been talking about this stuff to all my friends for the last fifteen years, knowing full well I sounded like a nut job. It's crazy to see how quickly we've arrived at this moment. And it's terrifying to see just how willingly we're walking off this cliff.
IkaikaW
@Bob Flint & Cymon Curcumin:

Yes, today humans can still outperform these humanoids and the cost to manufacture them is very high. But these things progress at exponential rates. As the iterations begin to stack, the costs begin to drop to nothing compared to the output, the abilities easily surpass us both physically and mentally, and the impacts of these two things combined don't change society, they break it. Humanity has never lived with real gods, infused with all the powers of imagined ones.

When I think of this topic I am constantly reminded of the story of Babel. God descends to see the great tower humanity builds (which purpose was to force the gods to descend and do as humanity desired). There, God says of humanity, "Now nothing they purpose to do will be withheld from them." Then he overfeeds their lips so they could not understand each other, causing them to leave off their project and scatter.

He knew something we're only just learning: when humans unite with a singular goal, nothing stands in their way. This is what we call "Progress"; I call it Greed Unchained.
martinwinlow
I'm puzzled why everyone is so convinced AI in this context (robots) is imminent and yet so many think autonomous vehicles are 'decades' away. I would think they are just as likely to succeed - or fail - as each other.
MCG
I feel it's important we do not project too much emotion upon these robots, even though they may be bipedal in shape, they are simply, machines. Smart toasters if you will. Sure, someday it may be difficult to distinguish between them and us. However, what matters to me, is that we may continue to move in a green direction, and preserve this rock we are all standing upon out here in lonely space. So that someday we may go beyond into the stars ourselves without the common burdens of labor, we may set our sights on something anew.
Daishi
@IkaikaW Many people confuse this but while computer processing has improved at exponential rates physical components such as servos and hydraulics used in robotics have not improved at exponential rates. The rate of technology adoption is speeding up. ChatGPT set a world record hitting 100m users in 2 and a half months. Humanoid robots have been around for ~30 years at this point and they are still hardly used by anyone for anything. With most things if you invested billions of dollars and 30 years time without achieving a goal you would question if you have the correct approach but not with humanoid robots apparently.
IkaikaW
@Daishi
Yes, but with AI on the job, I'm sure the rate of technological improvement in this field will advance equally exponentially.