Automotive

Every country should follow China's lead in banning 'hidden' car door handles

Every country should follow China's lead in banning 'hidden' car door handles
'Hidden' door handles like this one on a Tesla Model Y can prove dangerous if you're in an accident
'Hidden' door handles like this one on a Tesla Model Y can prove dangerous if you're in an accident
View 4 Images
'Hidden' door handles like this one on a Tesla Model Y can prove dangerous if you're in an accident
1/4
'Hidden' door handles like this one on a Tesla Model Y can prove dangerous if you're in an accident
A Xiaomi SU7 sedan was involved in a crash in China, and it reportedly proved fatal because bystanders couldn't open the doors to rescue the driver in time
2/4
A Xiaomi SU7 sedan was involved in a crash in China, and it reportedly proved fatal because bystanders couldn't open the doors to rescue the driver in time
Chinese authorities have illustrated the various types of door handles they're prohibiting from 2027
3/4
Chinese authorities have illustrated the various types of door handles they're prohibiting from 2027
The MG Windsor EV, a hit in India, has a lot going for it except for those door handles
4/4
The MG Windsor EV, a hit in India, has a lot going for it except for those door handles
View gallery - 4 images

Those car door handles that blend into the exterior door panel for a sleek look might soon be a thing of the past – and China's taking the lead in outlawing them.

They might marginally enhance a vehicle's appearance and aerodynamics – and in the case of EVs, the latter can amount to longer range. But these flush door handles can pose a range of potentially hazardous issues.

That includes people being locked out of their cars because the handles froze over in cold weather, and preventing passengers in crashed cars from being rescued because the handles wouldn't deploy from the outside without a key or sufficient power. This actually happened in December 2023 to a Tesla Model Y SUV owner in Virginia: an off-duty firefighter who spotted a couple inside trying to escape their burning car noted the passenger door wouldn't budge because the electronically powered doors failed.

The incident prompted an investigation into Model Y and Model 3 handles by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration last September. A day later, Tesla said it was working on a redesign of its retractable handles.

A Xiaomi SU7 sedan was involved in a crash in China, and it reportedly proved fatal because bystanders couldn't open the doors to rescue the driver in time
A Xiaomi SU7 sedan was involved in a crash in China, and it reportedly proved fatal because bystanders couldn't open the doors to rescue the driver in time

China is said to have begun looking into the issue back in July 2024; Bloomberg notes it followed multiple EV crashes that proved fatal when people in those vehicles were trapped inside because the doors wouldn't open. Last October, when a Xiaomi SU7 Ultra sedan's collided with a median barrier in Chengdu, West China, the EV caught fire and bystanders' attempts to rescue the driver failed; the doors equipped with flush-mounted handles reportedly didn't open.

China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has ruled that starting January 1, 2027, all cars sold in the country must have mechanical releases on their door handles. They must also come with mechanical releases on the interior.

Chinese authorities have illustrated the various types of door handles they're prohibiting from 2027
Chinese authorities have illustrated the various types of door handles they're prohibiting from 2027

That means 'hidden' handles like the press-to-release ones on the Tesla Model Y and Hyundai Ioniq 5, as well as motorized ones that pop or slide out when electronically activated, are banned. You can instead have a conventional handle, or a semi-hidden one with room for your fingers to slide under it and release it.

The move is critical for the country's enormous auto market, where China Daily notes 60% of the top 100 selling EVs feature hidden handles.

China's government conducted safety research with dozens of automakers and testing institutions, and drafted the Safety Technical Requirements for Automobile Door Handles. It brought on board the likes of Xiaomi, BYD, Geely, Toyota, Hyundai, GM, Ford, Volkswagen, and Porsche.

Other countries would do well to follow suit, and stop this worrying design feature from becoming the norm and causing more incidents around the world. China's not only done all the legwork, but also shown it can get major brands to adopt the necessary measures to avoid going down this road.

In India, for example, you can find Tesla's Model Y starting to become available with its hidden handles; one of the country's top-selling EVs, the MG Windsor MPV, also prominently features them; one of the largest local automakers, Mahindra, recently launched a couple of futuristic electric SUVs with these too.

The MG Windsor EV, a hit in India, has a lot going for it except for those door handles
The MG Windsor EV, a hit in India, has a lot going for it except for those door handles

The move to make doors accessible again is gaining momentum, though. In Illinois, Representative Robin Kelly proposed legislation last month to require manual door releases in new cars – hopefully we'll see more such recommendations in the near future. A couple of extra miles of range is well worth sacrificing to enhance vehicular safety.

Source: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China via TechCrunch

View gallery - 4 images
18 comments
18 comments
Chase
Hear Hear. Form should never come at the expense of function, especially when that trade-off can kill you.
ClauS
I beg to differ. Instead of banning the 'hidden' car door handles they should have made the homologation requirements more strict. Yes, an collision gives verry short time to react, but airbags are working just fine. If one really wants 'hidden' car door handles they need to be sure that the handles are deployed in time, before the collision is cutting the power or locking the mechanism. Banning them is not a service to anyone, and saying that every country should do this is sincerely short-minded. Just leave the engineers do their job.
anthony88
If the top of the handle all the way to the bottom of the handle remain flush with the bodywork, but there is a hollow in the bodywork beneath the handle that allows a hand to get in under them, are they still considered as being flush?
Edward Vix
Anthony, looks like that's not considered a problem: "You can instead have a conventional handle, or a semi-hidden one with room for your fingers to slide under it and release it."
Aermaco
Chase is spot on, Claus appears to suffer from the arrogant engineering blindness that more complexity can save the day, and Anthony and Edward recognize the simple engineering wisdom that all engineers should have.
The overly engineered narrow path to just add more complicated, uncrashworthy, and instant electronic logic computer-controlled actions just keeps it blind and therefore dangerously dumb. I can't believe it's a fact that no engineers were smart enough to keep a mechanical, physical means to open cars from the inside when they design computer-controlled electronic doors?
I do wonder why rescuers attempting to rescue trapped people in cars can't find something that will break the tempered glass that is designed for side windows to easily shatter into gravel for escape? Maybe I'm not unaware of how only specific, sharp and hardened points work. Shouldn't a simple, hard, round golfball-sized rock do it?
SquareStem
Guaranteed to fail in cold/snow/ice weather and also another mechanical doo-dad to repair later, assuming they don't insist you have to buy a new car because they don't carry whatever $2 part is necessary.
Karmudjun
There have been US citizens who drove into water and could not escape their Teslas which proved fatal. In the 1980's there were stories of sportscars with power windows going off-road into water filled drainage ditches and without a soft-top roof the occupants drowned if not rescued quickly due to inability to get the window open and they lacked the now recommended window hammer & seat belt cutter safety tool. Now everything has power windows - no cranks for manual control. China is ahead of the game. And Claus? When did the "agreement" requirements ever refer to emergency egress failures due to design specs? In the USA we used to say a penny for your thoughts, not a "Unused Original First Issue Mint Silver dollar for your opination".
TechGazer
Flush, aerodynamic handles could be simple: a plate you can push the top of to move the bottom out enough to slide your fingers under to pull. I'm sure there are plenty of other possibilities. Alternatively, just accept that a safe, reliable, convenient handle will cost you $20 or whatever in extra fuel/charge over the lifetime of your vehicle compared to dangerous hidden handles. What are the actual fuel/charge numbers for existing vehicles with the hidden handles vs non-hidden ones?
Ed
Wow, I think it is interesting how many people are jumping onto this bandwagon without understanding it.
Regular door handles freeze over all the time. People have died when the car submerged because the regular door handles would work.
And to top it all off, there is a complete misunderstanding of the difference between flush handles and electronic mechanisms. They are two different things, Tesla just happened to implement both.
There have been thousands of similar issues with standard door handles. When it comes to freezing, it's well over millions of times that regular door handles have failed.
And not mentioned in this article are rear door kid safety locks that keep the rear doors from opening from the inside. And yes, they are present on most cars made for well over 20 years.
physics314
There is so much wrong on these cars, door handles are just the tip of the iceberg. The ubiquity of touch controls is a distraction disaster, power windows without a manual override, and overly aggressive self-locking doors, and a myriad of "smart" features, to name some
That said, it's worth remembering that misguided auto innovations are not new. For the first 25 years, airbags killed more people than they saved. Sadly, they were the law because of Ralph Nader, a lawyer with no engineering education fancying himself a car safety expert.
Load More