Automotive

Has Tesla given up on autonomous driving?

Has Tesla given up on autonomous driving?
Tesla has apparently changed the meaning of “Full Self-Driving”, and it sounds an awful lot like the company is giving up on its promise
Tesla has apparently changed the meaning of “Full Self-Driving”, and it sounds an awful lot like the company is giving up on its promise
View 6 Images
Tesla has apparently changed the meaning of “Full Self-Driving”, and it sounds an awful lot like the company is giving up on its promise
1/6
Tesla has apparently changed the meaning of “Full Self-Driving”, and it sounds an awful lot like the company is giving up on its promise
Tesla's current FSD, despite its name, is not totally autonomous. The driving mode needs the driver to monitor the car and take control at any time.
2/6
Tesla's current FSD, despite its name, is not totally autonomous. The driving mode needs the driver to monitor the car and take control at any time.
In response to legal and regulatory scrutiny, Tesla altered the nomenclature of Full Self-Driving to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)"
3/6
In response to legal and regulatory scrutiny, Tesla altered the nomenclature of Full Self-Driving to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)"
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving was always marketed aggressively, but it’s no better than Level-2/2+ ADAS
4/6
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving was always marketed aggressively, but it’s no better than Level-2/2+ ADAS
Tesla's FSD cost has also dropped dramatically, by $7,000 from its peak in 2023
5/6
Tesla's FSD cost has also dropped dramatically, by $7,000 from its peak in 2023
The fine print for FSD mentions that it doesn’t make the vehicle “autonomous” and, moreover, doesn’t promise it as a feature
6/6
The fine print for FSD mentions that it doesn’t make the vehicle “autonomous” and, moreover, doesn’t promise it as a feature
View gallery - 6 images

Full self-driving. Tesla’s astonishingly wild promise seems to have gone off the rails. It’s been nearly a decade since Tesla announced that all of its production vehicles would be capable of autonomous driving, with CEO Elon Musk repeatedly stating that it would happen by the end of each year since 2018.

Countless customers bought FSD packages for up to US$15,000, thinking they'd end up with a fully autonomous car that comes and picks them from the train station. Guess what? We’re in 2025, and it still hasn’t happened yet.

In fact, now, Tesla has apparently changed the meaning of “Full Self-Driving” (FSD), and it sounds an awful lot like the company is giving up on its promise. It happened when the Tesla board filed a document with the Securities and Exchange Commission that details a potentially absurd $1 trillion compensation package for Musk.

Tesla's current FSD, despite its name, is not totally autonomous. The driving mode needs the driver to monitor the car and take control at any time.
Tesla's current FSD, despite its name, is not totally autonomous. The driving mode needs the driver to monitor the car and take control at any time.

But here’s the catch: it is reliant on the manufacturer meeting critical milestones, including "10 million active FSD subscriptions." So what, you’d ask?

Well, as it turns out, the document's definition of FSD is so unclear that you can't help but feel that the company is protecting itself in case it can’t hold true to its promises. Heck, it doesn’t even mention the SAE automation levels.

We know Full Self-Driving is Tesla's most advanced driving software, but despite its name, it is not totally autonomous. The driving mode needs the driver to monitor the car and take control at any time. That is Level 2 autonomy, as defined by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).

Per the text, “FSD means an advanced driving system, regardless of the marketing name used, that is capable of performing transportation tasks that provide autonomous or similar functionality under specified driving conditions.”

In response to legal and regulatory scrutiny, Tesla altered the nomenclature of Full Self-Driving to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)"
In response to legal and regulatory scrutiny, Tesla altered the nomenclature of Full Self-Driving to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)"

This means that at any given instance, Tesla can go on to create something that has "similar functionality" to an autonomous system without being fully autonomous. As Electrek points out, this description is broad enough to include Tesla's current version of FSD – even something as simple as an advanced driver-assist system (ADAS).

And if that is the case, Tesla could very well rest on its laurels, and Musk would go on to receive his enormous compensation package. And in case you didn’t know, Tesla has already removed the FSD trademark entirely and rebranded the system as "Intelligent Assisted Driving" in China.

It seems like a curious case of bait-and-switch – something users and buyers won’t take lightly. But for now, Tesla's FSD cost has also dropped dramatically, by $7,000 from its peak in 2023, which coincides with the fall in Tesla sales.

The truth is, Tesla’s Full Self-Driving was always marketed aggressively, but it’s no better than Level-2/2+ ADAS. But it’s not like Tesla’s the only company not offering full Level 4 autonomy. It currently exists only in robotaxis (Waymo, Baidu Apollo, Pony.ai, and WeRide are a few examples). If you consider the consumer industry, no one’s there yet.

Tesla’s Full Self-Driving was always marketed aggressively, but it’s no better than Level-2/2+ ADAS
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving was always marketed aggressively, but it’s no better than Level-2/2+ ADAS

Sure, the likes of Mercedes-Benz are a step ahead of Tesla, having a Level-3 “Drive Pilot” approved in Germany, Nevada, and California (traffic jams, up to ~40 mph). But that’s the highest regulatory approval for private cars right now.

Honda, on the other hand, launched a limited Level-3 Legend Hybrid EX in Japan, which was lease-only and limited to 100 units. And while Hyundai has Level-4 robotaxi pilots running in the US, production Hyundai cars remain at Level-2+.

Government regulations, safety concerns, and costs at hand have largely slowed the progress in this pursuit. But even then, Tesla could have done more to be transparent with its customers.

Tesla's FSD cost has also dropped dramatically, by $7,000 from its peak in 2023
Tesla's FSD cost has also dropped dramatically, by $7,000 from its peak in 2023

Not too long ago, the National Transportation Safety Board chair slammed Tesla’s program as "not fully self-driving" but also "misleading." The California DMV sued Tesla for fraudulent advertising due to FSD's name, with the legal battle ongoing.

In response to legal and regulatory scrutiny, Tesla has now altered the nomenclature of Full Self-Driving to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)." Blimey.

Source: Tesla via Electrek

View gallery - 6 images
8 comments
8 comments
Drjohnf
I recently bought a Cybertruck simply because I really needed a truck in the family fleet and the F150's loaded up were not, in my opinion, worth the money being asked.
The FSD in the Tesla is at least a decade ahead of the nearest competitor.
As far as I'm concerned, I don't need or want any more driving autonomy in the vehicle beyond what is currently offered - though I would welcome it if it arrived.
Telsa sends along regular updates to the software of the truck which includes constant incremental improvements in the FSD.
I have late model Porsches and Mercedes vehicles that aren't even close to being in the same ballpark as Tesla for FSD or whatever term they are using now.
The fact is that Tesla is a software company first - and they seem to prioritize that on top of their hardware - and it shows.
No other brand comes even close to the FSD that Tesla has been offering for a few years now. I don' think that Tesla is giving up on FSD - they're just staring to play the game differently in order to keep their edge and to get around stifling government over-regulation in my opinion.
LeviRizetnikof
Did anyone actually research this article? Talk to Tesla? Talk to a Tesla stock analyst? Or even ChatGPT or Perplexity?
Because Musk has stated that autonomous vehicles are the future of the company – and backed it up with the introduction of Tesla autonomous taxis in Austin. They're hiring right now in New York City to test their autonomous taxi. And they designed an entirely new vehicle without a steering wheel to be that taxi when they're introduced at scale.
Tesla taxis are obviously based on the autonomous driving tech that Tesla has been iterating for more than a decade.
Too many people use Tesla autonomous driving daily to give this kind of reporting a pass. They're your fact checkers. Like the Cybertruck commenter. You don't own your reputation. They do.
guzmanchinky
My friend has a Model X with FSD, it is mind blowing even in it's current iteration. I would like to see how it compares to a Cadillac with supercruise, I hear that's great as well (on freeways, which is where you really need it anyway)...
Smokey_Bear
What a crap article, It's written in a way that makes people think that Tesla doesn't have the worlds best self driving...which it does. It's still got a ways to go before you can enter your destination, and take a nap, but they are clearly getting closer to that day. I don't see that happening this year, but late next year, maybe a version 15, will do just that. It's not a sensor problem, it's a brain problem. Tesla is spending a lot of money on a dedicated super computer focused on autonomous driving (Cortex), and the larger Cortex 2, is currently under construction.
Trylon
They basically had to give up when Musk ordered them to strip away the radar, lidar and sonar sensors. You can't do self-driving without those today. Humans rely only on sight, and look how bad we are at it. The number of reported collisions in the US total in the millions every year. The unreported crashes are likely far more numerous.
christopher
SAE is the same definition, "under specified driving conditions" is EXACTLY THE SAME as "supervised".
What do you think a machine is supposed to safely do when it finds itself *outside* those "specified driving conditions"? We live in regulatory purgatory - if you want FSD you need to change your government. And that's *despite* the facts [from statistics, you know, actual reality] that you're 10 **times** less likely to be injured ,and 100 ***times*** less likely to be killed under "FSD" than human control.
Christian
See what's funny is, I've got friends with slightly older teslas that don't have the face-tracking interior camera. They could take a nap or browse on their phones for lengthy periods of time without paying attention to the car or road and have at times. FSD is THAT good. But after 2019 when the interior cameras were installed it's much stricter about driver supervision, though it doesn't really need to be. Now, if you're looking at the Tesla screen inputting a destination or changing the trip or even just picking music for too long, it barks at you as if it's impossible to keep an eye on the road while you fiddle with the GPS or radio. Funny that it doesn't care about eating while it's driving. But if I turn my head to talk to my friend or passenger, or enjoy the scenery, warning lights. If I'm adjusting where my next charging station will be, warning lights. It's overly strict about the supervision, when it really is a lot better than people who don't have one want to think.
Sure, every once in a great while it'll do something funny and weird usually in just following GPS directions, or having trouble with some complicated intersection, and the need for supervision is still required, but 99% of the time, it could be totally hands off.
Busa10
Has this author even been in a Tesla no less let the car drive him somewhere? My son and I went across country from Colorado to rural Wisconsin and FSD took us there. It planned the charging points, navigated through city and highway traffic and parked the car at our destination. Totally amazing. It didn't matter the amount of traffic or even day or night. It just worked. Now as for Elon's proposed 1 trillion dollar compensation... Why isn't it mentioned that he now employs over 150,000 people and is breaking technical challenges nobody else has been able to do?