Space

Mars may have had more water than the Arctic Ocean

View 2 Images
Mars as it may have looked 4.5 billion years ago
European Southern Observatory
Ancient Mars may have had an ocean covering 20 percent of its surface (Image: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center)
Mars as it may have looked 4.5 billion years ago
European Southern Observatory

In Edgar Rice Burroughs's Barsoom novels, Earthman John Carter's adventures took place on the dry beds of Mar's ancient oceans. Now NASA scientist's say that may not be so far fetched. Though they haven't found signs of any thoats, they have estimated that Mars may once have had enough water to form a vast ocean surrounding its north pole of which only plains remain.

Today, Mars is drier than the Atacama Desert and what little water that remains is either locked in the polar ice caps or deposited as permafrost deep below ground. However, by using Earthbound infrared telescopes to measure hydrogen isotopes in the Martian atmosphere, scientists have been able to calculate how much water the Red Planet may have once harbored in its ancient past.

According to NASA, some 4.3 billion years ago, Mars may have been a much wetter place with over 20 million km3 (5 million mi3) of water. Scientists believe that this water wasn't spread evenly over the planet, but collected in the northern hemisphere's Northern Plains to form an ocean covering 19 percent of the Martian surface and plunging up to a mile (1.6 km) deep in places.

This would make for a body with more water than Earth's Arctic Ocean and covering more of the planet than the Atlantic does on Earth. It's also a volume of water 6.5 times greater than what is in the Martian ice caps today, which indicates a massive loss of water into space after Mars started drying up about 3.7 billion years ago.

Ancient Mars may have had an ocean covering 20 percent of its surface (Image: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center)

The estimate was based on observations conducted by the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile, and the W.M. Keck Observatory and NASA Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii. Using hydrogen isotope measurements from an ancient meteorite that was blasted away from Mars 4.5 billion years ago as a baseline, the astronomers took six years (three Martian years) worth of measurements of the water molecules in the Martian atmosphere with a particular emphasis on building up planet-wide maps of the ratios of different hydrogen isotopes.

The scientists found that there was a distinct difference between ancient and modern Mars in terms of the water molecules present. Ordinary water is made of up H2O, but there's also another form of water made up of HDO, which is a hydrogen atom, an oxygen atom, and a deuterium atom replacing the second hydrogen atom. Deuterium is a heavy isotope of hydrogen, which is identical except that it has a neutron in its nucleus.

NASA says that the important thing about this is that since these heavy water molecules are, well, heavier, they don't escape from the Martian atmosphere as easily as regular water molecules, so as the planet loses its water, there's less light water compared to heavy water. On Earth, the HDO/H,20 ratio is 1:3,200, but on Mars it's 1:400. Compared to the Martian meteorite, the ratio is such that it indicates that Mars has lost 87 percent of its water. This not only indicates that Mars once had more water, but was wetter longer, which makes those looking for signs of life more optimistic.

"With Mars losing that much water, the planet was very likely wet for a longer period of time than was previously thought, suggesting it might have been habitable for longer," says senior Goddard scientist Michael Mumma.

The NASA findings were published in Science.

The video below discusses the ancient Martian ocean.

Source: NASA

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
4 comments
Buzzclick
Fascinating stuff.
If Mars is colder, than all this water would have likely been frozen, right?
And how did the planet lose its atmosphere?
Grunchy
I wonder where the water all went, sure it evaporated into space, but wouldn't it keep the same orbital inertia? Did it all splash into Venus? Or is it on Earth, now?
Bob809
Why is the surface shown as it looks now? Surely, with all that water, there would be greenery? Surely? The craters, even the landscape itself would likely have been different, wouldn't it? Is this NASA being lazy?
fkilmore
No one mentions the fact that Mars (and earth) would have been much smaller 4B years ago!....The water may still be there as a water table below ground...Planets form by gathering mass and being hit by meteorites....and grow non stop...4B years of this would have buried any ocean...If earth gets more solid rock than water meteorites over the next 4B years, our water will probably disappear also into the ground also...or vice versa...I cant believe so called scientists have missed this fact in their calculations...it is astonishing..