The mRNA flu vaccine race heats up with two human trials commencing

The mRNA flu vaccine race heats up with two human trials commencing
Moderna is one of two companies starting first phase human trials testing mRNA flu vaccines
Moderna is one of two companies starting first phase human trials testing mRNA flu vaccines
View 1 Image
Moderna is one of two companies starting first phase human trials testing mRNA flu vaccines
Moderna is one of two companies starting first phase human trials testing mRNA flu vaccines

Biotech firm Moderna has commenced human trials testing an mRNA influenza vaccine targeting four separate viral strains. Building on its profoundly successful mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, the company is ultimately planning to develop a single vaccine against multiple respiratory viruses.

It is impossible to understate the incredible success of mRNA vaccines over the past year. The stunning efficacy of this vaccine technology against SARS-CoV-2 is offering the world a path out of this global pandemic. And the technology is now rapidly moving forward on another problematic viral disease, influenza.

Moderna’s influenza vaccine candidate is currently dubbed mRNA-1010. It’s the company’s first flu vaccine to move to human trials and it targets four separate strains of the virus: influenza A H1N1, H3N2, influenza B Yamagata and Victoria.

The Phase 1/2 trial is taking place in the United States and is designed to primarily evaluate the vaccine's safety and ability to generate an immune response, or immunogenicity. The plan is to ultimately recruit around 180 subjects over the coming months.

Currently available flu vaccines are only around 50 percent effective and they are reformulated every year to target the three or four influenza strains predicted most likely to spread. However, these formulations are decided up to nine months in advance because the mode of production takes time. One of the strengths of mRNA vaccines is how quickly they can be developed once a problematic viral strain has been detected.

Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, says the plan is to not only develop an effective multi-strain influenza vaccine but to incorporate other viral antigens into the one shot to generate a combination vaccine protecting against a number of respiratory viruses.

“We believe that the advantages of mRNA vaccines include the ability to combine different antigens to protect against multiple viruses and the ability to rapidly respond to the evolution of respiratory viruses, such as influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and RSV,” says Bancel. “Our vision is to develop an mRNA combination vaccine so that people can get one shot each fall for high efficacy protection against the most problematic respiratory viruses.”

The beginning of Moderna’s trial follows the recent commencement of another Phase 1 mRNA influenza vaccine trial. Developed by mRNA therapeutic company Translate Bio, and accelerated by pharma giant Sanofi, this vaccine focuses solely on the H3N2 strain of influenza.

The Translate Bio/Sanofi trial will evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of two different mRNA formulations. Several dose levels will also be explored as the trial looks to ultimately recruit up to 280 subjects over the coming months and hopefully deliver interim data by the end of 2021.

“We believe that mRNA technology could have several advantages for a seasonal flu application including the potential ability to demonstrate robust immune responses based on preclinical data to date, enable antigen specificity within a short time-frame from seasonal virus strain selection, and deploy agile manufacturing capacity,” says Translate Bio’s CEO Ronald Renaud.

Sources: Moderna, Translate Bio

Most excellent. Perhaps a vaccine against common rhinoviruses is also close behind? I would be overjoyed with a world free of flu and colds...
This place sucks ass
The average testing length for vaccines are between 10 -15 years. Only idiots will trust untested vaccines. That goes for these and that covid one that was tossed together in a year. Hard pass for me thanks.
“It is impossible to **understate** the incredible success of mRNA vaccines over the past year.”

Perhaps you intended “overstate”?
Where did this "10 year" misinformation thing come from? How do they know 10 years is enough to be sure? Maybe the delayed effects of vaccines won't be until after 20 years, or 30, or only when you're old. Heck, it's even possible it might attract meteorites on odd-numbered months after 27 years. We can't be sure!

But the one thing we do know for sure is (a) the chance of delayed effects is very very low, and (b) the chance of harm from Covid or the flu is much, much higher. Either learn some math or trust those who know math. But making up random numbers to justify a cowardly fear of vaccines is harming all of us.

And in the meantime, science outlets like New Atlas should delete antiscientific misinformation.
Same here, and I'm optimistic about the potential of mRNA. You just have to look at the effusive wording of the article's author to realize where they align, which is disappointing considering I've been following NewAtlas (form.GizMag) for years. Such statements like "impossible to understate" and "stunning efficacy" without ANY mention at all that the very inventor of mRNA technology has serious concerns with the way protein spike remnants are collecting in lung tissue, ovaries and might be crossing the blood/brain barrier, is disturbing in it's monolithic refusal to even consider that this isn't a 100% miracle drug of epically stupendous proportions.