Aircraft

Cryo-compressed hydrogen: A 40% aircraft range boost over liquid H2

View 2 Images
ZeroAvia is investigating the use of a higher-density cryo-compressed hydrogen fuel in aviation
ZeroAvia
ZeroAvia is investigating the use of a higher-density cryo-compressed hydrogen fuel in aviation
ZeroAvia
LLNL and Verne representatives with Verne's CcH2 storage system, scaled for use on semi trucks
Lawrence Livermore National Labs

ZeroAvia is working with San Francisco startup Verne to bring an even more energy-dense form of hydrogen to the clean aviation space. Cryo-compressed H2 could reduce costs, speed up fueling, and unlock 40% more flight range than cryogenic liquid H2.

Hydrogen is a pain in the butt. It's hard to store and transport, requiring either ultra-cold temperatures, or energy-hungry compression to get it into a useful volume. It's energy-inefficient to make, and there's no distribution network for it per se.

But if you want to decarbonize aviation, it's one of your only real fuel options. It might not carry as much energy as jet fuel, but it gives you a huge energy density boost as compared with lithium batteries. Hence, companies like ZeroAvia are working around the clock to get it tested and validated for use in commercial aircraft. Gaseous hydrogen fuel cell test flights are already well and truly underway – even at small airliner scale – and last year saw the first ever manned flight of an aircraft running on liquid hydrogen – a next-gen solution that should boost range significantly.

Now, ZeroAvia is looking to bring a third form of hydrogen fuel into the conversation, capable of carrying even more energy.

The idea of cryo-compressed hydrogen (CcH2) has been around for more than 25 years. It was first proposed as a high-density energy medium by Salvador Aceves at Lawrence Livermore National Labs, BMW created prototypes of a CcH2 system for passenger cars more than 10 years ago, and Cryomotive is one of a number of companies now looking to bring its benefits to long-haul trucking, promising the range and quick fueling time of diesel in a zero-emissions fuel that stores more than 3,000 Wh/kg.

So what is it? CcH2 effectively combines the cryogenic cooling used to liquefy hydrogen with some of the compression used to store gaseous hydrogen. Where liquid hydrogen requires temperatures under 20 K (−253 °C/−423 °F) at ambient pressure, and gaseous hydrogen tends to be compressed into the 700 bar range at ambient temperatures, CcH2 shoots for a practical point in between, and can deliver significantly higher storage densities.

Say you keep the hydrogen at 20 K, then compress that to 240 bar. According to Langmi et al, the volumetric hydrogen storage increases from 70 g/liter to 87 g/liter. But you also greatly reduce, or potentially even nearly eliminate, the boil-off losses endemic to liquid H2 storage. And you can refill at the speed of liquid transfer, without needing millions of dollars' worth of compressor equipment at every fueling station.

LLNL and Verne representatives with Verne's CcH2 storage system, scaled for use on semi trucks
Lawrence Livermore National Labs

As Composites World explains, you can also use much lighter tanks, or build them from cheaper materials, because you don't need to handle 700 bar pressure levels. And you don't need to supply active cooling in your vehicle; the insulated tank maintains its cryogenic temperature by itself, since every time you use fuel, the remaining fuel expands into the tank and thermodynamics lowers the temperature.

And thus to ZeroAvia's new MOU with Verne. Verne worked with Lawrence Livermore National Labs last year to demonstrate a CcH2 system running at undisclosed pressure and temperature levels, but capable of storing 27% more hydrogen than the same size liquid H2 system.

Verne believes it can get its CcH2 technology up to a "40 percent greater usable hydrogen density than liquid hydrogen," and it's now working with ZeroAvia to "jointly evaluate the opportunities" for CcH2 in aviation, as well as investigating the ground-based infrastructure required for fast refueling at airports.

It'll be interesting to see where this goes. In a Composites World interview, Cryomotive's Tobias Brunner explained that his company believes its CcH2 storage could be "a good fit for aviation" – but only in smaller planes, since once you move to very large tanks holding hundreds or thousands of kilograms of fuel, liquid hydrogen takes back over as the more lightweight solution at the system level. We wonder if Verne has a different approach to try.

Source: ZeroAvia

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • LinkedIn
9 comments
Jim B
Formic acid fuel cells seem like a better bet. Or Nano electro fluid by Intuit (covered on Newatlas). Or e-fuel Butanol (made from CO2 using renewable/nuclear energy). All of these are liquids at room temperature and pressure.
Towerman
Outstanding this is Next level ! !

Let the Hydrogen Revolution Begin ! !

Lets leave anything nuclear or fossil fuels out of this they doing perfectly fine with this breakthrough ! !
martinwinlow
"A 40% aircraft range boost over liquid H2"... at what *additional* overall energy efficiency cost? Using H2 is already very inefficient when it's made from fossil fuels, let alone 'green hydrogen' (made from using renewable electricity to hydrolyse water). How much energy does cryogenically 'treating' the H2 use? The whole idea of using H2 for 'sustainable' aviation just goes from bad to worse!
Uncle Anonymous
Great news! Now, how many years before the logistics train catches up?
Towerman
@martinwinlow The cost of hydrogen is coming down year on year as production is ramped up.

Moreover, with the rising price of natural gas, the relative cost of green hydrogen produced from electrolysis is approaching price parity in many regions already.

Fossil fuels have an extraction cost, refining cost, distribution cost and some notional duty, yet have no cost associated with the pollution they cause Therefore at some level fossil fuels only appear cheaper because we do not associate the environmental cost with the purchase cost.

In future all hydrogen production will be virtually cost free when renewable energy is fully utilized.

A World of Wonder Awaits ! !
SussexWolf
An interesting concept, definitely worthy of further research. Hydrogen, whether combusted in a turbine or used in a fuel cell, is likely to play a significant role in decarbonised aviation. Finding ways of storing it more efficiently, both in terms of energy density, and in terms of the weight and complexity of storage, is key to making it viable to use.

Of course the elephant in the room remains the cost of the H2 to start with, but if we are talking about zero carbon fuels for long haul aircraft, the cost of the fuel is a challenge, whether it’s H2, efuels, SAF, methanol, ammonia, etc. SAF has the benefit of being a drop in replacement which can also be blended with conventional jet fuel during transition, but scaling up SAF realistically will require 2nd/3rd generation biofuels, and that remains a work in progress.
paul314
Cooling and compression aren't free. Where's that energy going to come from?
Steven Clarkson
@Paul 314
Solar.
Uncle Anonymous
@ Steven Clarkson: With the gradual transition away from coal generation, plus the added demand to supply electricity for EVs as combustion technology is phased out, and the electricity for the home and industrial sectors, which is on the rise BTW, you may find that solar isn't enough. Solar power isn't some sort of power panacea.

https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/index.php?tbl=T07.02A#/?f=A&start=1949&end=2021&charted=1-2-3-5-8-14-15