Automotive

Toyota is still trying to make hydrogen-fueled vehicles a reality – and it's got help

Toyota is still trying to make hydrogen-fueled vehicles a reality – and it's got help
Toyota collaborated with VDL on this hydrogen fuel cell truck and began testing it in 2023
Toyota collaborated with VDL on this hydrogen fuel cell truck and began testing it in 2023
View 5 Images
Toyota collaborated with VDL on this hydrogen fuel cell truck and began testing it in 2023
1/5
Toyota collaborated with VDL on this hydrogen fuel cell truck and began testing it in 2023
One of the biggest challenges with hydrogen for transport is the slow growth of fueling infrastructure worldwide
2/5
One of the biggest challenges with hydrogen for transport is the slow growth of fueling infrastructure worldwide
The hydrogen-powered Mirai has landed at the bottom of Toyota's sales count for two years in a row, surprising no one
3/5
The hydrogen-powered Mirai has landed at the bottom of Toyota's sales count for two years in a row, surprising no one
Toyota collaborated with its subsidiary Hino on the Profia Z FCV truck, which launched in Japan last year
4/5
Toyota collaborated with its subsidiary Hino on the Profia Z FCV truck, which launched in Japan last year
The Kenworth T680 is powered by dual motors and a fuel-cell system from Toyota
5/5
The Kenworth T680 is powered by dual motors and a fuel-cell system from Toyota
View gallery - 5 images

Color me puzzled by this curious bit of news. Toyota is teaming up with Daimler Truck and the Volvo Group to advance the development of hydrogen-fuel-cell tech for zero-emissions heavy duty vehicles.

The three automakers will become equal shareholders in Cellcentric, a joint venture working on fuel-cell tech for cargo trucks and vehicles designed for off-road heavy duty applications. It already existed as an independently operating entity sustained by Daimler and Volvo; the news is that Toyota is joining the fold.

These forces combined will develop, produce and commercialize fuel-cell systems for such vehicles, manufacture the core components of fuel cells, and also support the development of hydrogen supply and infrastructure.

cellcentric – Company Film

That's great, but I'm still scratching my head over why these companies are bothering to do so – especially Toyota. Trying to figure that out has revealed some interesting facts.

For starters, Toyota has been developing fuel-cell tech for over three decades, starting all the way back in 1992. And since 2014, it's been making the Mirai, a hydrogen-powered sedan whose latest edition is priced at just over US$50,000, and has been the company's worst-selling model for the last two years – only 210 units reportedly sold last year. Somehow, it's still managed to find itself on Toyota's 2026 roster.

The hydrogen-powered Mirai has landed at the bottom of Toyota's sales count for two years in a row, surprising no one
The hydrogen-powered Mirai has landed at the bottom of Toyota's sales count for two years in a row, surprising no one

I don't mean to get hung up on the failure of this particular car here. But the thing is, if you buy a Mirai in the US, you can only realistically drive it in California, because it's the only state that has a handful of hydrogen refueling stations. That speaks to the state of fuel-cell infrastructure in the country. Europe's hydrogen refueling infrastructure for heavy trucks is still very much in its early construction phase too.

One of the biggest challenges with hydrogen for transport is the slow growth of fueling infrastructure worldwide
One of the biggest challenges with hydrogen for transport is the slow growth of fueling infrastructure worldwide

And while I just went over cars, it's worth noting that Toyota actually has experience developing fuel-cell systems for heavy duty vehicles too. Back in 2023, it collaborated with VDL to build a hydrogen-powered truck, with a view to test it over five years (you can see it at the top of our story).

The company also launched Japan’s first commercial hydrogen-powered truck last year, with over 400 miles (650 km) of range, over a five-year partnership with its subsidiary Hino Motors. You can also buy a Kenworth truck stateside with dual motors and fuel-cell tech from Toyota on board for 450 miles (724 km) of emissions-free driving.

Toyota collaborated with its subsidiary Hino on the Profia Z FCV truck, which launched in Japan last year
Toyota collaborated with its subsidiary Hino on the Profia Z FCV truck, which launched in Japan last year

I initially found this move odd simply because I'm far more used to hearing about advancements and proliferation in battery electric tech and infrastructure. We're getting better at squeezing out more range from lithium-ion batteries, and we're just starting to see solid-state batteries give the former a run for their money with a longer lasting, faster charging, and safer alternative.

That begs the question, why bother with hydrogen?

Well, the official word is that this is one way automakers intend to cut emissions, and they'll take wins wherever they can find 'em. Indeed, Daimler Truck CEO Karin Rådström noted in this joint venture press release: "This will enable us to strengthen development and further scale hydrogen technology, which we believe complements battery-electric drives in decarbonizing transport."

The Kenworth T680 is powered by dual motors and a fuel-cell system from Toyota
The Kenworth T680 is powered by dual motors and a fuel-cell system from Toyota

Toyota has previously said its aim with the development of hydrogen-based systems is "to minimize the environmental impact of our activities, reducing them to zero where possible." In fact, it plans to become fully carbon neutral by 2040. So if it can score green points somewhere in the world with the know-how it's gained over the last 34 years, that can only be a good thing.

I imagine that through the Cellcentric effort, Toyota will further its mission to decarbonize trucking in Europe, where infrastructure is slated to ramp up in the next few years and look somewhat usable by 2030. It's making big designs on battery-electric systems for consumer vehicles – launching multiple EVs and investing heavily in production in the US – so these two tracks may run parallel in the near future.

So yeah, bigger bets on hydrogen fuel cells weren't on my 2026 bingo card. But if it means more green trucks, I'll take it.

Source: Daimler Truck North America

View gallery - 5 images
8 comments
8 comments
fen
Hydrogen makes more sense than ever. You can produce it in your own country multiple ways. You can stockpile it all over the country. One attack one knock out your hydrogen across a city. I think we should be kicking ourselves for not investing sooner.
Just imagine Europe for example never sold one battery car and had only sold hydrogen. The impact of the straight of hormuz being closed would be much less to them. USA/Israel will target civillian power plants, that means one attack and you cant charge your solid state battery no matter how fast it charges.
Cujo
What a scam, Toyota just don’t want to give up on their old differentiators - ICE.
Hydrogen is widely marketed as a clean fuel of the future, yet its reality is far more damaging. More than 90% of hydrogen production today is derived from coal gasification or steam methane reforming, both of which carry large carbon footprints.
Hydrogen production is associated with emissions of almost 1,300 megatonnes of CO₂ equivalent annually — and rather than declining, those emissions have edged upward in recent years.
The problem extends beyond CO₂. Hydrogen indirectly heats the atmosphere about 37 times faster than carbon dioxide over the first 20 years after release, and leakage from pipelines, production facilities, and storage sites is a significant and growing source of atmospheric hydrogen.
When electrolysis uses electricity generated from burning natural gas, it produces twice the greenhouse gas emissions of steam methane reforming for the same quantity of hydrogen.
Until green production scales up, the gap between hydrogen’s clean reputation and its dirty production reality remains vast.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
FME III
This is senseless. Toyota is throwing good money after bad. Perhaps it is trying to save face given the millions and millions it must have sunk into the Mirai debacle. Real-world experience is China is proving that batteries are up to the task for heavy trucks. And Europe is dialing back its hydrogen infrastructure plans because the economics are not penciling out -- and never will. I invite all open-minded supporters of hydrogen for transportation to read the many articles on Cleantechnica on the topic, which are written by Michael Banard.
physics314
The reason serious vehicle manufacturers are pursuing hydrogen, despite the proliferation of batteries, is physics. There are very hard physical limits to the gravimetric and volumetric energy density of batteries. We are very close to those limits, and remaining gains will be in cost and charging time - which also have limits. Unlike BEVs, FCEVs are nowhere near their technical (and cost) limits.
Jim B
Methanol might be the future. It is liquid at room temperature and pressure, and can use the existing gasoline infrastructure. But making it is still as difficult and expensive as making hydrogen. There are proposals to use gas cooled nuclear reactors which can output 900+ celsius heat as an energy source for cheaper hydrogen/eFuel production. Gas cooled reactors have suffered to date from needing to use solid moderators such as graphite, which breaks apart and doesn't moderate that well, necessitating massive (expensive) reactor cores and vessels. Composite ceramic moderators such as Magnesium Oxide Beryllium Oxide may overcome the limitations of graphite and usher in a new energy and eFuel age.
Mike A.
You "bother" with H2 because if holds 300X times more energy by weight than the best battery chemistry. It will eventually be the storage medium of choice for heavy transport. But the BEV propaganda machine will fight H2 adoption every step of the way.
Brian M
@fen Spot - on Hydrogen and synth fuels (chemical energy) has many advantages over Li type batteries, not least its energy density, no need to beef up the national grid system to cope and distribution of the energy storage. Suspect it will also be more green in its technology, especially recycling.
Those arguing that hydrogen is not green because its created from processors that are fossil based processes are missing the point. The green hydrogen just needs to be scaled up, better still it can use surplus supply from green electricity generation, when no-one wants it - You get energy storage and reserves for free. The hydrogen route solves many of the problems of green energy.
It really is the best replacement for fossil fuels in many sectors.
Kwiz
Whilst I applaud the automakers and regulators for reducing emissions, in a report that was release about 8 years ago, the biggest group of emitters is major shipping as they use diesels that run of heavy diesel (basically a light crude) producing far higher emissions per hp than any auto engine. It is so bad that it works out to be more emissions than all the worlds transport. So why aren't our governments looking at that first? Is it because multinationals only own shipping whereas its easy to pick on the small person and small trucking companies that don't have the massive dollars?